Highway Data Discussion > Updates to Highway Data
AASHTO SCOH USRN Fall 2021
Highway63:
--- Quote from: Markkos1992 on February 13, 2022, 06:45:40 pm ---IA US 151 Business (Cascade) realignment
--- End quote ---
This may be a step above a crapshoot. I e-mailed the DOT asking about this and "Business 30" for Mount Vernon-Lisbon and I was told the localities are in charge of the signs. BUT...clearly the only way it gets marked on BGSs is if the state does it! I checked out the MVL business route and, as I suspected, it is not signed at all. I can go ahead and make the changes, but proof is *shrug*.
--- Quote ---MO US 54 Business (Lake Ozark) deletion
MO I-44 Business (Lebanon) deletion - application is missing
--- End quote ---
The first appears related to construction of a new interchange in the area. The second, I'd ask if it can it be deleted if the application isn't there, but Wikipedia already killed it, so *shrug*.
I'll go ahead and work on the changes. I think US 54 in the LOOZ area needs modification because of the project.
Markkos1992:
--- Quote from: Highway63 on February 28, 2022, 05:36:06 pm ---
--- Quote from: Markkos1992 on February 13, 2022, 06:45:40 pm ---IA US 151 Business (Cascade) realignment
--- End quote ---
This may be a step above a crapshoot. I e-mailed the DOT asking about this and "Business 30" for Mount Vernon-Lisbon and I was told the localities are in charge of the signs. BUT...clearly the only way it gets marked on BGSs is if the state does it! I checked out the MVL business route and, as I suspected, it is not signed at all. I can go ahead and make the changes, but proof is *shrug*.
--- Quote ---MO US 54 Business (Lake Ozark) deletion
MO I-44 Business (Lebanon) deletion - application is missing
--- End quote ---
The first appears related to construction of a new interchange in the area. The second, I'd ask if it can it be deleted if the application isn't there, but Wikipedia already killed it, so *shrug*.
I'll go ahead and work on the changes. I think US 54 in the LOOZ area needs modification because of the project.
--- End quote ---
These changes are done here (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/5657).
froggie:
--- Quote from: Markkos1992 on February 15, 2022, 02:19:53 pm ---GSV already shows the US 90 realignment at AL59_N (the new point should be at the CR 68 intersection) for whenever froggie next does an Alabama update.
None of the rest are either already in the HB or have been implemented yet (as far as we know).
--- End quote ---
I fixed this one this morning.
Markkos1992:
Looks like we can realign US 264 now: https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=100.msg2798868#msg2798868
I plan to travel this corridor tomorrow on my Smithfield's Chicken-N-BBQ trip with my mom.
EDIT (12-21-2022): We definitely can. The only signs that still say ALT are on NC 11 Bypass.
EDIT (12-29-2022): The US258 labels on US264AltWil need to be changed from W and E to S and N when working on the transition back to US 264.
mapmikey:
I have rerouted US 264. A new US 264 ALT (greenville) has been created.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version