Author Topic: VA: VA 217 Bagley Circle  (Read 442 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3105
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 09:53:33 pm
VA: VA 217 Bagley Circle
« on: March 17, 2022, 07:16:27 pm »
Signage on Bagley Circle shows VA 217 going all around the circle. Should there be a separate file for VA217Bag or is that necessary?

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3105
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 09:53:33 pm
Re: VA: VA 217 Bagley Circle
« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2022, 11:13:15 am »
Looking at how VA 376 is entered, I guess we could also consider moving BagCir into the middle of the loop and calling it a day.

Offline mapmikey

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1179
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 07:53:54 pm
    • Co-curator Virginia Highways Project
Re: VA: VA 217 Bagley Circle
« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2022, 04:43:14 pm »
VA 376 is a good example of how rectangles being omitted from TM makes a difference.  VA 376 is posted from 3 entrances but 2 are rectangles only.

In VA 217's case, the circle is posted in at least 3 places, plus the State St spoke is posted at VA 16.  I haven't been on VA 217 in over 10 years but I don't believe any of the other spokes is posted.  Thus it is possible to have one spoke and the entire circle as one route.

In the queue.

 

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3105
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 09:53:33 pm
Re: VA: VA 217 Bagley Circle
« Reply #3 on: June 29, 2022, 03:39:22 pm »
So am I correct here that the new NMP created from this is a FP?

Offline mapmikey

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1179
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 07:53:54 pm
    • Co-curator Virginia Highways Project
Re: VA: VA 217 Bagley Circle
« Reply #4 on: June 29, 2022, 07:14:47 pm »
Yes