Author Topic: SC: Various Point Concerns After 3/21/2022 Trip  (Read 1320 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3075
  • Last Login:Today at 06:35:18 am
SC: Various Point Concerns After 3/21/2022 Trip
« on: April 06, 2022, 03:15:18 pm »
Note that there will be a lot of edits to this post.

US 21: 
1.  US21Bus/601Trk_S>-US21Bus_S
2.  US601/21Bus_N>-US601/21Bus

US 21 BUS (Orangeburg):  US301/601_S should be US301/601.

US 52:
1.  I-95(164)>-I-95
2.  I-526(18)>-I-526

US 123: 
1. SC20>-FalParkDr
2. I-385BS>-NorSt

US 178: 
1.  US21/178Bus_S>-US21/178Bus
2.  US601/21Bus_N>-US601/21Bus
3.  I-95(82)>-I-95

US 276: I-85(48)>-I-85.

US 301: 
1.  Consider replacing the shaping points between SC 3 and US 278 with visible points.
2.  It looks like S-5-38 should be S-5-58.
3.  SC33_S>_SC33
4.  I-26(154)>-I-26
5.  I-95(97) needs to be recentered.  (also affects US 15 and I-95)
6.  Should the Con labels show only what is on the black signs?  (US15/301Con)  (US301/521Con)
7.  Is there a good replacement for TapTrl?  (also affects US 52)
8.  Consider replacing shaping points with visible points between SC51 and US76_W.

US 601: SC33>-SC33_N

US 601 TRUCK (Orangeburg): 
1.  US21/21Bus_S>-US21/21Bus or US21_S
2.  US178/178Bus_E>-US178/178Bus or US178_E

SC 6: 
1.  US15Con>-BassDr.
2.  I need a point where the road that is labeled on OSM as SC 6 CONN is.  Apparently the road name here is Five Chop Rd.

SC 153:  BroRd_W>-BroRd

« Last Edit: May 23, 2022, 06:17:55 pm by Markkos1992 »

Offline mapmikey

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1171
  • Last Login:Today at 06:18:24 am
    • Co-curator Virginia Highways Project
Re: SC: Various Point Concerns After 3/21/2022 Trip
« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2022, 02:48:27 pm »
changes made and in the queue

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3075
  • Last Login:Today at 06:35:18 am
Re: SC: Various Point Concerns After 3/21/2022 Trip
« Reply #2 on: June 21, 2022, 07:48:53 am »
Adding the next round here for now since these have not ben sent in yet, and these are all in western SC.

US 123: 
1.  Consider replacing the shaping point east of GA/SC with a visible point at Hopewell Church Rd (HopChuRd).
2.  PumpHouRd should be PicRd or WelRd.
3.  Consider replacing the shaping point west of US76_W with a visible point.
4.  OldPenRd>-PenRd.  (also affects US 76 and SC 28, no evidence that this is part of SC 93 now)
5.  US123Con>-RossAve  (also affects nearby SC 93)
6.  Should a point be added for this slip ramp to Broad St?

US 276:
1.  US29Spr>-ColSt.  US29Con>-WadeHamBlvd.
2.  RutSt>-RutSt_S
3.  FurUniv>-FurUni?
4.  Consider replacing the shaping point west of SC8 with a visible point.
5.  Maybe add a point here for Caesars Head State Park.  Also consider other trailheads/overlooks if needed for shaping purposes.
« Last Edit: June 21, 2022, 10:21:52 am by Markkos1992 »

Offline ntallyn

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 328
  • Last Login:March 24, 2024, 03:22:47 pm
Re: SC: Various Point Concerns After 3/21/2022 Trip
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2022, 11:38:56 pm »
Also related to SC6 (above), I don't need the point (didn't get far enough east on it), but I recommend adding a point on SC6 just east of I-95 at the SC6 connector (the road to Exit 97 of I-95).

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3075
  • Last Login:Today at 06:35:18 am
Re: SC: Various Point Concerns After 3/21/2022 Trip
« Reply #4 on: June 25, 2022, 04:16:19 am »
Also related to SC6 (above), I don't need the point (didn't get far enough east on it), but I recommend adding a point on SC6 just east of I-95 at the SC6 connector (the road to Exit 97 of I-95).

That is the point that I was referring to.

Offline mapmikey

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1171
  • Last Login:Today at 06:18:24 am
    • Co-curator Virginia Highways Project
Re: SC: Various Point Concerns After 3/21/2022 Trip
« Reply #5 on: July 04, 2022, 03:21:52 pm »
Adding the next round here for now since these have not ben sent in yet, and these are all in western SC.

US 123: 
1.  Consider replacing the shaping point east of GA/SC with a visible point at Hopewell Church Rd (HopChuRd).
2.  PumpHouRd should be PicRd or WelRd.
3.  Consider replacing the shaping point west of US76_W with a visible point.
4.  OldPenRd>-PenRd.  (also affects US 76 and SC 28, no evidence that this is part of SC 93 now)
5.  US123Con>-RossAve  (also affects nearby SC 93)
6.  Should a point be added for this slip ramp to Broad St?

US 276:
1.  US29Spr>-ColSt.  US29Con>-WadeHamBlvd.
2.  RutSt>-RutSt_S
3.  FurUniv>-FurUni?
4.  Consider replacing the shaping point west of SC8 with a visible point.
5.  Maybe add a point here for Caesars Head State Park.  Also consider other trailheads/overlooks if needed for shaping purposes.

Changes made and in the queue.

Note that US 123 Con is now signed.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3075
  • Last Login:Today at 06:35:18 am
Re: SC: Various Point Concerns After 3/21/2022 Trip
« Reply #6 on: July 05, 2022, 05:10:46 pm »
mapmikey, am I missing something or did you not send the first round of updates?

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3075
  • Last Login:Today at 06:35:18 am

Offline mapmikey

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1171
  • Last Login:Today at 06:18:24 am
    • Co-curator Virginia Highways Project
Re: SC: Various Point Concerns After 3/21/2022 Trip
« Reply #8 on: August 26, 2022, 09:37:25 am »
I evidently did not include the 6-19 SC changes in my submission.  They will be in the upcoming one.

I have moved the US 78-178 jct.

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1829
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Today at 06:11:34 am

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3075
  • Last Login:Today at 06:35:18 am
Re: SC: Various Point Concerns After 3/21/2022 Trip
« Reply #10 on: September 04, 2022, 04:36:03 am »
US 78:
1.  I-26(205)>-I-26
2.  I-526(18)>-I-526

Quote
US 123:
1. SC20>-FalParkDr

There was no indication to me that SFalParkDr had an essential prefix....

Quote
US 301:
2.  It looks like S-5-38 should be S-5-58.

May 2022 GSV still seems to show this as the case.

US 521:
1.  I-95(122)>-I-95
2.  US301/521Con>-US301Con

US 52:  The concurrency with US 301 near Florence has been broken.
« Last Edit: September 04, 2022, 05:11:20 am by Markkos1992 »

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1829
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Today at 06:11:34 am
Re: SC: Various Point Concerns After 3/21/2022 Trip
« Reply #11 on: September 04, 2022, 06:29:08 am »
US 78:
1.  I-26(205)>-I-26

I would leave the 'I-26(205)' point as is.  Why?  Because there should be another 'I-26()' label on the route.
US52Con -> I-26(209A)

This change would also need to be done in US-52's file.  I checked the entire connector, and couldn't find any signage for 'US-52 Con'.  Thus, changing it to a 'I-26()' label is appropriate here.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3075
  • Last Login:Today at 06:35:18 am
Re: SC: Various Point Concerns After 3/21/2022 Trip
« Reply #12 on: September 04, 2022, 08:33:03 am »
^Then the original I-26 file change on US 52 would need to be reverted.

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1829
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Today at 06:11:34 am
Re: SC: Various Point Concerns After 3/21/2022 Trip
« Reply #13 on: September 04, 2022, 11:04:26 am »
^Then the original I-26 file change on US 52 would need to be reverted.

???

There's no mention of changing any other US-52 label for I-26 in the thread except for my mention.

US 52:
1.  I-95(164)>-I-95
2.  I-526(18)>-I-526

That's the only other mention for US-52 in this thread.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3075
  • Last Login:Today at 06:35:18 am
Re: SC: Various Point Concerns After 3/21/2022 Trip
« Reply #14 on: September 04, 2022, 11:48:48 am »
Yep that was a Sunday Morning Brainfart on my part.   :pan: