Author Topic: MN: NMPs  (Read 152 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Jim

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2357
  • Last Login:Today at 08:31:08 pm
MN: NMPs
« on: May 30, 2022, 01:58:15 pm »
@froggie, same as you might have seen in some other threads.  Would you object to me taking a pass through the MN NMPs and fixing or marking as FPs as appropriate?

Offline froggie

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 695
  • Last Login:Today at 10:30:03 am
Re: MN: NMPs
« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2022, 11:50:57 pm »
I'll have some time to look at it on Wednesday.  Though I can tell you the MN 298 ones are false positives.
« Last Edit: May 30, 2022, 11:53:09 pm by froggie »

Online Jim

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2357
  • Last Login:Today at 08:31:08 pm
Re: MN: NMPs
« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2022, 08:03:39 am »
Thanks.  I added the MN 298 ones to the FP list.  Everything else looks like a straightforward lining up of points that should match up.

Offline froggie

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 695
  • Last Login:Today at 10:30:03 am
Re: MN: NMPs
« Reply #3 on: June 06, 2022, 10:22:58 am »
Currently working on these.  I do have at least one other FP:  292/61, where 292 turns onto 61's frontage road.  I may or may not have later FPs depending on how I deal with I-35W/MN 62 and I-35W/I-94.  Both are cases where the freeways are parallel but on separate carriageways, with ramps to one but not the other.
« Last Edit: June 06, 2022, 10:55:59 am by froggie »

Online Jim

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2357
  • Last Login:Today at 08:31:08 pm
Re: MN: NMPs
« Reply #4 on: June 09, 2022, 10:54:21 pm »