Author Topic: NJ: US 1 at NJ 29  (Read 2037 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3109
  • Last Login:Today at 04:43:21 pm
NJ: US 1 at NJ 29
« on: September 26, 2018, 05:06:34 pm »
These routes are not lined up in the HB.  Should they be?

The point for Warren St (WarSt) is useful, but it is just the connection from the ramp to NJ 29 here.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4234
  • Last Login:April 07, 2024, 11:18:57 pm
  • I like C++
Re: NJ: US 1 at NJ 29
« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2018, 09:46:59 am »
NJ29, I could see combining WarSt and US1, as a parclo variant, into a single point centered at US1.
US1 itself, I'd more or less leave as-is, save for recentering NJ29 on the NJ29 centerline. (PA/NJ matches the state line as shown in ESRI, so I'm fine with "no-build" here.)
Unsure which WarSt you were referencing above -- the one on NJ29 or the one on US1?
NJ NJ29 WarSt, I could fold into a new US1 as mentioned above.
NJ US1 WarSt, I'd say is independently useful for it's connections to/from the local road network.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3109
  • Last Login:Today at 04:43:21 pm
Re: NJ: US 1 at NJ 29
« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2018, 10:36:55 am »
I meant the one for NJ 29.  I agree that the US 1 one is fine as-is.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4234
  • Last Login:April 07, 2024, 11:18:57 pm
  • I like C++
Re: NJ: US 1 at NJ 29
« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2018, 12:07:45 pm »
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca