User Discussions > Other Discussion

Stats restricted to systems/regions/etc of interest

<< < (2/12) > >>

Jim:
Regarding the ability to restrict to systems/regions/etc of interest:

https://github.com/TravelMapping/Web/issues/360

yakra:
Topic split from usaush (United States Historic US Routes)

US 89:
Not to reopen any old discussions, but if such a toggle system is implemented, perhaps TM could revisit its current policy regarding unsigned routes. Those routes could go in a separate system that could be turned off if the user doesn't feel the need to clinch unsigned routes.

Duke87:

--- Quote from: US 89 on October 06, 2019, 02:20:54 pm ---Not to reopen any old discussions, but if such a toggle system is implemented, perhaps TM could revisit its current policy regarding unsigned routes. Those routes could go in a separate system that could be turned off if the user doesn't feel the need to clinch unsigned routes.

--- End quote ---

I'd be all in favor of having separate toggleable systems for unsigned routes. At least to the degree there is interest in drafting the systems in question.

Bickendan:

--- Quote from: Duke87 on October 07, 2019, 07:33:12 pm ---
--- Quote from: US 89 on October 06, 2019, 02:20:54 pm ---Not to reopen any old discussions, but if such a toggle system is implemented, perhaps TM could revisit its current policy regarding unsigned routes. Those routes could go in a separate system that could be turned off if the user doesn't feel the need to clinch unsigned routes.

--- End quote ---

I'd be all in favor of having separate toggleable systems for unsigned routes. At least to the degree there is interest in drafting the systems in question.

--- End quote ---
ORH  ;)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version