Recent Posts

1

In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: usams: Mississippi State Highways

« Last post by rickmastfan67 on Today at 12:25:55 am »

MS301:
MS304Sce -> M304 ? since there is no second wp intersecting another MS304

That's correct as-is.  That's a bannered MS-304 there.

Mainline MS-304 is up along I-69 there.

Which makes me find another discovery.....

MS304SceHer:
Seems the route has been possibly decommissioned.

@ MS-301:
March '23 (signed)
Sept '23 (signage removed)

@ I-55(280):
Aug '23 (still signed, but a month before the MS-301 signage change above)

@ PraRd point:
Sept '23 (signage still remains here, but could have been right before or in the middle of the signage change @ MS-301??)

2

Updates to Highway Data / MS: I-55 exit updates

« Last post by rickmastfan67 on Yesterday at 11:14:37 pm »

98C -> 98B

3

Updates to Highway Data / Re: OK: I-40 updates

« Last post by rickmastfan67 on Yesterday at 10:58:06 pm »

Missing -> 82A (formerly 81)

Leaving this alone, as it doesn't meet the 0.5 mi Double-Half Interchange threshold. The existing point 82 is already fairly well-centered within the footprint, and further tweaking it may bring the route out of tolerance to the NE.

I would say this qualifies for a separate point due to the fact that it was posted as Exit 81, and completely separate from the 'original' Exit 82 up till at least May '24 (yes, only LAST YEAR!!)  This change to being signed as a part of Exit 82 happened less than a year ago.

Had I made this post back in November before that Dec '24 GSV showed up with the updated exit number, I bet you'd have 0 issue adding it in.

4

In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: usams: Mississippi State Highways

« Last post by rickmastfan67 on Yesterday at 10:44:53 pm »

MS301:
MS304Sce -> M304 ? since there is no second wp intersecting another MS304

That's correct as-is.  That's a bannered MS-304 there.

Mainline MS-304 is up along I-69 there.

5

Updates to Highway Data / TX: I-69 Update

« Last post by CoreySamson on Yesterday at 04:39:59 pm »

It appears that I-69 now extends south to TX Spur 10 based on this signage, which was put up in the past year:
https://maps.app.goo.gl/MVB7vmNHQdziFofA9
https://maps.app.goo.gl/WQ8h78nxDKeiGEEQ7

6

In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: usams: Mississippi State Highways

« Last post by michih on Yesterday at 04:12:53 pm »

MS145Abe:
US45_S -> US45/8 ?


MS145Net:
US45_N -> US45/278_N ?
US45_S -> US45/278_S ?


MS145Inv:
Add wp for 4th Street since it's heading to US49W's SouRd wp ?


MS149Men:
MS540 -> MS540_E ? albeit we don't have MS540 as implied concurrency?
btw, should we merge both MS540s into one?


MS161Cla:
US61_S -> US61/278 ?
US61_N -> US49/61 ?


MS161She:
US61_N -> US61/278_N ?
US61_S -> US61/278_S ?


MS198Col:
US98_W -> US98/13


MS301:
MS304Sce -> M304 ? since there is no second wp intersecting another MS304


MS302:
I-55 -> I-55/69 ?


MS315SceSar:
MS35/315 -> MS315_S since MS35 is on concurrency
MS315 -> MS315_N


MS322:
US61_S -> US61/278


MS333SceGre:
US51_S -> US51
MS7 -> MS7_E


MS366Gol:
AL/MS -> MS/AL (it's the only border label that needs to be switched within usams)

7

In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: usams: Mississippi State Highways

« Last post by michih on Yesterday at 03:22:50 pm »

MS7:
I-55(206) -> 206(55) see https://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/wayptlabels.php#exitconc_num_on_num
I-55(208) -> 208(55)
I-55(211) -> 211(55)

Ummm, I think you have that wrong.  Those labels are actually correct as-is since MS-7 doesn't use exit numbers itself anywhere.
See: https://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/wayptlabels.php#exitconc_num_on_unnum

Thanks, I've removed all those items from my post However, I've implemented it like that in my region for years..... I don't know why

8

Other Discussion / Re: Mapping 6+ lane freeways

« Last post by michih on Yesterday at 03:19:02 pm »

Just bumping this as I am unsure who takes care of IA or if there is somewhere else to be reporting this.

In general, anyone can update the file via Github submission.

9

Updates to Highway Data / Re: KY/AR: New I-169 and I-57!

« Last post by TBKS1 on Yesterday at 03:10:11 pm »

So, north of Exit 6:
* Confirmed, nothing yet?
* Just Don't know yet?
* Other?


Edit:

Arkansas is pushing to get I-57 signed from Little Rock to Walnut Ridge at least as soon as the Jacksonville reconstruction is completed in 2027.

Judging from this, the Jacksonville segment may be a while yet, and could potentially hold up signage north of there -- potentially even N of exit 6 itself.

With this in mind, should I just add I-57 up to exit 6 for now and extend it as more signage appears N of there?

For now, I'll catch up on the AARoads thread.

Posted this on aaroads but it probably won't be signed in Jacksonville proper until after the construction is completed there, although it may be signed past exit 11. Again I won't be able to check this for almost three weeks as I'll be halfway across the country during that.

10

Updates to Highway Data / Re: OK: US-69 exit number updates

« Last post by yakra on Yesterday at 03:09:27 pm »

Delaying this till after the PR for my other OK changes so I can pull in JefHwy.
Could conceivably hit this later today or tomorrow.