Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: oscar on January 09, 2016, 05:54:19 pm

Title: GA: US 1 bypass of Oak Park
Post by: oscar on January 09, 2016, 05:54:19 pm
I drove through Oak Park (just south of I-16) on Thursday. US 1 traffic has been moved to a new bypass around Oak Oark, as much as half a mile west of town, between GA 46 and the south city limits. At least the south end of the old route through town dead-ends in a cul-de-sac, so through traffic can't stay on the old route, and I doubt the old route will become a new US 1 business route.

There are two travel lanes southbound, and one northbound, on the new bypass. Construction is continuing to finish the project, so the reroute might not yet be "official", nor has GDOT sought AASHTO approval (assuming it thinks approval is needed). Also, online mapping hadn't caught up to the change last I looked, though some satellite imagery shows the bypass under construction.
Title: Re: GA: US 1 bypass of Oak Park
Post by: yakra on September 12, 2018, 11:03:23 pm
One of the oldest topics on the forum, hiding away on the 6-Month+ Outlook board, page 2. :)
Is this still something that needs attention?
Title: Re: GA: US 1 bypass of Oak Park
Post by: the_spui_ninja on September 13, 2018, 03:32:57 pm
Looks like it; the HB still has US 1 going through Oak Park instead of around it.
Title: Re: GA: US 1 bypass of Oak Park
Post by: the_spui_ninja on September 13, 2018, 08:34:18 pm
Should this be moved to "Updates to Highway Data" then?
Title: Re: GA: US 1 bypass of Oak Park
Post by: oscar on September 13, 2018, 08:48:21 pm
Should this be moved to "Updates to Highway Data" then?

Yes, now that OSM at least has caught up to the change. The US 129 bypass of Gray (http://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=2399.msg9224#msg9224), which is now also shown in OSM, is already in Updates to Highway Data.
Title: Re: GA: US 1 bypass of Oak Park
Post by: the_spui_ninja on September 14, 2018, 10:59:44 am
Since GA just got dropped, do you want me to fix this quickly?
Title: Re: GA: US 1 bypass of Oak Park
Post by: oscar on September 14, 2018, 11:19:20 am
Since GA just got dropped, do you want me to fix this quickly?

That'd require changes to GA 4 and GA 86, too. I'm not sure where the drafter of that in-dev (preview) system is on the GA state routes.
Title: Re: GA: US 1 bypass of Oak Park
Post by: mapcat on September 14, 2018, 01:45:56 pm
That'd require changes to GA 4 and GA 86, too. I'm not sure where the drafter of that in-dev (preview) system is on the GA state routes.
He's gone.

theFXexpert (http://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?action=profile;u=18)
Last Login:February 22, 2017


I'd say go ahead and make the changes to all the necessary files.
Title: Re: GA: US 1 bypass of Oak Park
Post by: the_spui_ninja on September 14, 2018, 04:57:08 pm
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/2226 (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/2226)
Title: Re: GA: US 1 bypass of Oak Park
Post by: ntallyn on September 14, 2018, 05:06:59 pm
That'd require changes to GA 4 and GA 86, too. I'm not sure where the drafter of that in-dev (preview) system is on the GA state routes.
He's gone.

theFXexpert (http://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?action=profile;u=18)
Last Login:February 22, 2017


I'd say go ahead and make the changes to all the necessary files.

I can potentially pick up the GA state routes. I haven't done anything before (other than submit errors, changes, etc.), but I'm willing to give it a shot.
Title: Re: GA: US 1 bypass of Oak Park
Post by: mapcat on September 14, 2018, 07:45:19 pm
I can potentially pick up the GA state routes. I haven't done anything before (other than submit errors, changes, etc.), but I'm willing to give it a shot.
Thanks for offering. I don't have any problem with this, and welcome your assistance as long as others are ok with it (we need to get this system activated).

First thing you'd want to do is check this topic (http://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=215.0) to see which issues raised in the peer review have been addressed. Many of the items were posted after theFXexpert disappeared.
Title: Re: GA: US 1 bypass of Oak Park
Post by: Jim on September 15, 2018, 09:46:18 pm
So am I correct that if I traveled through there on what was US 1 that I should now have a gap in US 1, but should probably add the US1 to HarSt segment so I get that little piece of Georgia 86 that used to be concurrent with US 1 through Oak Park? 
Title: Re: GA: US 1 bypass of Oak Park
Post by: yakra on September 16, 2018, 01:51:03 pm
Sometimes I'll load data from an older version in the commit history into WPTedit.
Did you try that and it's not sufficient to answer your question? (I haven't looked at any of this on the map myself.)
Title: Re: GA: US 1 bypass of Oak Park
Post by: ntallyn on September 24, 2018, 08:29:59 pm

First thing you'd want to do is check this topic (http://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=215.0) to see which issues raised in the peer review have been addressed. Many of the items were posted after theFXexpert disappeared.

Will look through it this weekend.
Title: Re: GA: US 1 bypass of Oak Park
Post by: michih on September 29, 2018, 02:37:08 am
First thing you'd want to do is check this topic (http://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=215.0) to see which issues raised in the peer review have been addressed. Many of the items were posted after theFXexpert disappeared.

Will look through it this weekend.

I think the issue was fixed by the_spui_ninja, wasn't it? Only partial fix?

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/2226 (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/2226)

btw: ntallyn, there are more open GA issues if you wanna be the future maintainer of Georgia...
Title: Re: GA: US 1 bypass of Oak Park
Post by: the_spui_ninja on September 29, 2018, 10:39:42 am
First thing you'd want to do is check this topic (http://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=215.0) to see which issues raised in the peer review have been addressed. Many of the items were posted after theFXexpert disappeared.

Will look through it this weekend.

I think the issue was fixed by the_spui_ninja, wasn't it? Only partial fix?
I just got the Oak Park stuff since it was a quick fix.
Title: Re: GA: US 1 bypass of Oak Park
Post by: ntallyn on November 11, 2018, 10:23:33 pm
First thing you'd want to do is check this topic (http://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=215.0) to see which issues raised in the peer review have been addressed. Many of the items were posted after theFXexpert disappeared.

Will look through it this weekend.

I think the issue was fixed by the_spui_ninja, wasn't it? Only partial fix?

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/2226 (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/2226)

btw: ntallyn, there are more open GA issues if you wanna be the future maintainer of Georgia...

Working my way through the issues identified (verifying what has and hasn't been fixed). Now I'm looking for the waypoint editor. The only thing I've found is an old link to CHM. Am I just overlooking it in the git repo? Or is it a web interface?

Nick
Title: Re: GA: US 1 bypass of Oak Park
Post by: oscar on November 11, 2018, 10:35:07 pm
Working my way through the issues identified (verifying what has and hasn't been fixed). Now I'm looking for the waypoint editor. The only thing I've found is an old link to CHM. Am I just overlooking it in the git repo? Or is it a web interface?

http://travelmapping.net/wptedit/

For other resources you might need/want to use, go to TM's home page. The bottom line has a link to "Developer Tools/Links", which includes the above link to TM's updated waypoint editor.
Title: Re: GA: US 1 bypass of Oak Park
Post by: ntallyn on November 12, 2018, 09:10:13 pm

http://travelmapping.net/wptedit/

For other resources you might need/want to use, go to TM's home page. The bottom line has a link to "Developer Tools/Links", which includes the above link to TM's updated waypoint editor.

Thanks!
Title: Re: GA: US 1 bypass of Oak Park
Post by: mapcat on November 12, 2018, 10:14:43 pm
@ntallyn: I asked James (rickmastfan67) to add you as a collaborator, so you should soon be able to see all of the instructions topics.