Author Topic: NJ: US 322 Minor Point Concerns  (Read 123 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1381
  • Last Login:Today at 07:35:33 pm
NJ: US 322 Minor Point Concerns
« on: December 28, 2020, 08:32:48 pm »
1.   BoweBlvd should technically be longer.
2.   SLeiAve should just be LeiAve.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3134
  • Last Login:Today at 08:58:25 pm
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1381
  • Last Login:Today at 07:35:33 pm
Re: NJ: US 322 Minor Point Concerns
« Reply #2 on: December 29, 2020, 10:40:25 am »
I did want to note that I went with a "no-build" take on CR536.  My understanding based on Wikipedia is that CR536 is concurrent with US 322 west to the PA State Line from CR536_W, but I think that making changes here on that alone is more trouble than it is worth for a county route.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3134
  • Last Login:Today at 08:58:25 pm
Re: NJ: US 322 Minor Point Concerns
« Reply #3 on: December 29, 2020, 01:00:29 pm »
Oh man, these are fun. :P
If this were an otherwise identical waypoints situation, CR536_W and CR536_E would check out. But since there's a multiplex involved, the "otherwise" bit doesn't kick in.
The multiplex, followed by a regular old crossing, give us CR536_E and CR536. Luckily, only CR536_W is in use, leaving us free to move CR536_E on top of it.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca