Highway Data Discussion > Updates to Highway Data

OR point labels

(1/2) > >>

yakra:
US20: US26 -> US26_W
US26: US20 -> US20_W
OR131: US101/OR6 -> US101/6

Bickendan:
Of these, only one that really merits attention is the OR 131 one, with me noting I prefer the full label as currently stands. But, for consistency, I'll fix it to US101/6.
The US 20 and 26 ones -- since neither split again in Oregon, I'd argue the labels as they currently are are fine as is.

yakra:
http://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/wayptlabels.php
Waypoint labels for multiplexes:

--- Quote --- For the multiplex splits, add a suffix: an underscore followed by a direction letter. The direction letter should match the signed direction the concurrent route is splitting toward. US80_W in the US25 file means that US 80 heads west from US 25 at that point but is concurrent to the east.
--- End quote ---

si404:

--- Quote from: Bickendan on September 20, 2019, 05:14:14 am ---Of these, only one that really merits attention is the OR 131 one, with me noting I prefer the full label as currently stands. But, for consistency, I'll fix it to US101/6.
--- End quote ---
US101 (and no mention of OR6) is an acceptable label too. Dealing with the issue of making it look as if US101 and US6 are there.

michih:

--- Quote from: yakra on September 19, 2019, 07:42:42 pm ---US20: US26 -> US26_W
US26: US20 -> US20_W
--- End quote ---

I agree and think that it's not a suggestion but the only way to go.


--- Quote from: yakra on September 19, 2019, 07:42:42 pm ---OR131: US101/OR6 -> US101/6
--- End quote ---

I'm not sure how this is threated in US but I'd prefer just US101 without OR6 since US route is a "higher" (tier) system.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page