Author Topic: BC: NMPs  (Read 202 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jim

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2423
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 10:25:21 pm
BC: NMPs
« on: June 05, 2022, 10:02:02 pm »
Looks like a few FPs and a fairly small number of points that need aligning, which I plan to do in the next few days.  There's one "looks intentional" pair that I'd like to hear from whoever plotted those before changing or marking FP.

Offline oscar

  • TM Collaborator
  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1372
  • Last Login:Today at 12:19:54 am
    • Hot Springs and Highways pages
Re: BC: NMPs
« Reply #1 on: June 06, 2022, 12:30:45 am »
Here's the NMP log entries for the "looks intentional" pairs:

bc.bc001@44A 49.228668 -122.829123 LI
bc.bc007b@BC7_W 49.228668 -122.829124 LI
bc.bc007b@BC7_W 49.228668 -122.829124 LI
bc.tchmai@44A 49.228668 -122.829123 LI

I might've had something with that, while I was maintaining in BC only cantch, and Si was managing canbc until it got activated (now it's dropped in my lap). But I don't recall any reason to leave those files slightly out of synch, and I see no reason not to fix the NMPs.

Offline si404

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1683
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 02:18:55 pm
Re: BC: NMPs
« Reply #2 on: June 06, 2022, 03:55:07 am »
BC7B and BC1/TCH are on different parallel carriageways through the complex interchange, and the intentional NMP was created to break the concurrency. Up to you if you want to merge it.

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3744
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 02:01:05 pm
Re: BC: NMPs
« Reply #3 on: June 06, 2022, 04:56:43 am »
BC7B and BC1/TCH are on different parallel carriageways through the complex interchange, and the intentional NMP was created to break the concurrency. Up to you if you want to merge it.

yep, should must stay as-is!

Offline oscar

  • TM Collaborator
  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1372
  • Last Login:Today at 12:19:54 am
    • Hot Springs and Highways pages
Re: BC: NMPs
« Reply #4 on: June 06, 2022, 08:15:28 am »
BC7B and BC1/TCH are on different parallel carriageways through the complex interchange, and the intentional NMP was created to break the concurrency. Up to you if you want to merge it.

yep, should must stay as-is!

Sure, let's keep it. Mark as FP.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3903
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 10:18:08 pm
Re: BC: NMPs
« Reply #5 on: June 06, 2022, 09:18:11 am »
should must
Another option is to leave the graph connection (and thus the Intersecting/Concurrent Routes feature) in place, and break the concurrency with a hidden point.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3744
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 02:01:05 pm
Re: BC: NMPs
« Reply #6 on: June 06, 2022, 10:02:32 am »
Agree!

Offline Jim

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2423
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 10:25:21 pm
Re: BC: NMPs
« Reply #7 on: June 09, 2022, 10:46:45 pm »
I haven't done anything with the BC7B and BC1/TCH which is sounds like can/should be handled a bit differently.  Everything else should be cleared up or marked FPs on tomorrow's site update.  Changes in this commit:

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/commit/68ed13cfde9b41dd4a7e18166c6a76836b1877ee