Author Topic: VA: US 60 ToI264 Point  (Read 327 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1386
  • Last Login:Today at 09:15:26 pm
VA: US 60 ToI264 Point
« on: November 15, 2020, 05:49:04 pm »
This has been given an INTERSTATE_NO_HYPHEN datacheck error that cannot be marked as a FP.

I guess 22ndSt is the better option here since it is the way to I-264.

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1099
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Today at 12:57:41 am
Re: VA: US 60 ToI264 Point
« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2020, 10:01:26 pm »
Back story to this label.  This was back in the early days of the US Highways and I created it.  It was determined to be the best solution due to the twin one-way roads there to/from I-264.

So, if we do anything, I think the best solution if we keep the point 'centered' as it currently is, is to go with the label of "ToI-264" instead.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3136
  • Last Login:Today at 04:37:55 pm
Re: VA: US 60 ToI264 Point
« Reply #2 on: November 15, 2020, 10:19:30 pm »
Rules have come a lot more into focus since CHM's early days though.
Choose the first type that applies, n'at.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline mapmikey

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
  • Last Login:April 15, 2021, 01:28:16 pm
    • Co-curator Virginia Highways Project
Re: VA: US 60 ToI264 Point
« Reply #3 on: December 21, 2020, 07:31:23 pm »
not far enough...this situation is not covered in those rules.

If it were an unposted primary route I would use that designation (I am befuddled why this was never put into the primary system as VA 44).

It is a one-way pair with different street names on each roadway.

I called it 21st/22ndSt


Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1386
  • Last Login:Today at 09:15:26 pm
Re: VA: US 60 ToI264 Point
« Reply #4 on: December 23, 2020, 01:01:33 pm »
not far enough...this situation is not covered in those rules.

If it were an unposted primary route I would use that designation (I am befuddled why this was never put into the primary system as VA 44).

It is a one-way pair with different street names on each roadway.

I called it 21st/22ndSt



While I am ok with this move in general, I think that this move may cause us to question other one-way route combination points.  (An example on my end would be PA764 at 7thSt in Altoona.)

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3136
  • Last Login:Today at 04:37:55 pm
Re: VA: US 60 ToI264 Point
« Reply #5 on: December 24, 2020, 12:18:00 am »
I'll often put a point midway between an "implied couplet" in similar situations, but just pick one of the roads for the label.
I consider it a case of Truncated, visible cross road name (where the "name" happens to have numbers) rather than a Visibly numbered cross road designation, with https://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/wayptlabels.php#dropnamed thus applying.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1386
  • Last Login:Today at 09:15:26 pm
Re: VA: US 60 ToI264 Point
« Reply #6 on: April 03, 2021, 05:50:35 pm »
Oddly enough, we have precedent for using 21st/22ndSt in Montana on US 87 in all places.  The label here is "1/2AvN".