Highway Data Discussion > Completed Highway Systems Threads
usapr: Puerto Rico Territorial Highways
compdude787:
I'll probably continue reviewing in the next few days, but I noticed that PR 30 was missing from the list of highways in the highway browser, because apparently it wasn't in the usapr.csv file or the usapr_con.csv file. I just did a pull request to add it, but you might want to check to see if there are any other errors of this sort.
si404:
PR30 is in the Select Numbered State Freeways currently, as are PR53 and PR66. They need to be removed from there when they are added to usapr, which shouldn't really be until the system is activated.
mapcat:
--- Quote from: compdude787 on May 23, 2017, 12:44:33 am ---I'll probably continue reviewing in the next few days, but I noticed that PR 30 was missing from the list of highways in the highway browser, because apparently it wasn't in the usapr.csv file or the usapr_con.csv file. I just did a pull request to add it, but you might want to check to see if there are any other errors of this sort.
--- End quote ---
Since there's sometimes a reason for omissions, I'd appreciate it if you'd just point them out here and let me make the call on whether or not to add them. It doesn't usually take me too long. As Si said, 2 PR53's and PR66 are also in usansf and will stay there until activation.
compdude787:
--- Quote from: mapcat on May 23, 2017, 08:47:19 am ---
--- Quote from: compdude787 on May 23, 2017, 12:44:33 am ---I'll probably continue reviewing in the next few days, but I noticed that PR 30 was missing from the list of highways in the highway browser, because apparently it wasn't in the usapr.csv file or the usapr_con.csv file. I just did a pull request to add it, but you might want to check to see if there are any other errors of this sort.
--- End quote ---
Since there's sometimes a reason for omissions, I'd appreciate it if you'd just point them out here and let me make the call on whether or not to add them. It doesn't usually take me too long. As Si said, 2 PR53's and PR66 are also in usansf and will stay there until activation.
--- End quote ---
Sorry, I forgot that it was in usansf. I just thought I was being helpful...
compdude787:
Okay, I am now continuing my review.
PR2RMay: According to GSV, PR380 doesn't appear to be signed at its intersection with PR 2R, so it should be removed. The waypoint for CllMenVigo should be centered on the intersection because there is not a one-way couplet here, according to GSV.
PR2RAgu: No problems found.
PR3: CamBal should be changed to CllFer. Just south of Ceiba, there should be a point at PR 53 (the corresponding 6a waypoint on PR 53 doesn't appear to actually be closed per GSV). PR30(28A) should be PR30(28), and the waypoint for PR713 should be moved a few hundred feet west to the actual intersection.
Okay, that's all for now, time to go to bed. Sorry about the slow pace. Hopefully it will go faster as the routes get shorter!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version