Highway Data Discussion > In-progress Highway Systems & Work
itass: Italy Strade Statali
Spinoza:
--- Quote from: Spinoza on October 09, 2020, 05:14:10 am ---
--- Quote from: Spinoza on December 01, 2019, 10:03:21 am ---
--- Quote from: michih on November 27, 2019, 12:54:01 pm ---
--- Quote from: Spinoza on August 19, 2019, 04:41:44 am ---As for ANAS website, it appears it is not updated yet :pan:
--- End quote ---
Is it updated now?
If not, do the pdfs per region indicate the routes which were transferred? https://www.stradeanas.it/it/le-strade/rientro-strade
Sorry if it's BS, I just saw a post on another forum with this link.... ;)
--- End quote ---
Yes, all regions I posted here are updated: Tuscany, Liguria, Molise, Basilicata, Umbria, Calabria, and also Abruzzo, Campania, Latium.
Marche and Puglia are updated but the new roads do not show in the map, only in the dropdown menu.
--- End quote ---
I contacted ANAS to let them know of the outdated maps.
They answered that they have programmed the maps update - but alas they didn't give me any time frame.
--- End quote ---
I would like to report that ANAS has finally updated the maps in their website.
I didn't thoroughly check all the roads but it seems they're mostly there.
EDIT:
It seems that *almost* all the regions had their maps updated, with the notable exception of Lombardy...
michih:
Updates to Campania and Marche should be live with the next site update.
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/5028
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/5029
Spinoza:
--- Quote from: michih on August 10, 2021, 01:24:12 pm ---Updates to Campania and Marche should be live with the next site update.
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/5028
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/5029
--- End quote ---
Thanks!
Seems that not all the new roads are there, though. For instance, in Marche SS360 is missing, as well as SS485, SS502 and some others.
si404:
--- Quote from: si404 on April 15, 2021, 02:52:54 pm ---
--- Quote from: michih on April 15, 2021, 02:42:12 pm ---@Si404, what do you generally think about a split into regions for future SR systems?
If we would agree on splitting, would we do it before or after the rework and/or activation of itass? I mean, we could also activate itass by regions.... smaller iterations, starting with regions where the transfer back to ANAS already happened etc.
--- End quote ---
If there's going to do a split, the rework and review of itass is the time to do it.
--- End quote ---
Bump on this - do we want to split?
I've drafted split routes for the other systems, and am happy to do itass if we decide to split.
michih:
--- Quote from: si404 on August 15, 2021, 08:41:16 am ---
--- Quote from: si404 on April 15, 2021, 02:52:54 pm ---
--- Quote from: michih on April 15, 2021, 02:42:12 pm ---@Si404, what do you generally think about a split into regions for future SR systems?
If we would agree on splitting, would we do it before or after the rework and/or activation of itass? I mean, we could also activate itass by regions.... smaller iterations, starting with regions where the transfer back to ANAS already happened etc.
--- End quote ---
If there's going to do a split, the rework and review of itass is the time to do it.
--- End quote ---
Bump on this - do we want to split?
--- End quote ---
I'd love to see Italy split into regions. It is the last of the "big five" (Western) European countries which is not yet split on TM.
Please agree with @panda80 what's the best way (and time) to split because you'd work on the same files. I think it would be wise to wait till @panda80 will have dealt with all regions. But who knows what @panda80 thinks about it...
We should use https://tmstage.teresco.org/ for testing the split version, and keep in mind that there was some trouble when splitting DEU, ESP and FRA. The "new" 6-field user .list file entry should help. Maybe @yakra can help again with converting the user .list files?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version