User Discussions > Other Discussion

Spurs

(1/4) > >>

jayhawkco:
Is there a precedent written out somewhere for how we treat Spur routes that aren't signed as such?  For example, the Idaho State Highway Spurs, none of them are actually signed as spur.  They are (in these cases) signed as the main route.  I'm fine leaving them in if they're signed as something, but was just curious if other states had done things differently.

Chris

yakra:
Was usaid a relatively early system?
Was it AndyTom who first got it going back in the CHM days?

si404:
The recentering and bringing labels up to code I did on that system years ago means it was very early stuff - roughly contemporary with the US highways (which had similar problems in many states).

theFXexpert:
FL 295 in Pensacola has some thing like this where the spur is signed identically to the main route.
It is treated like a different section for TM purposes.

Main: https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?r=fl.fl295
Spur: https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?r=fl.fl295wpe

FL 70 had a somewhat similar situation until signs for its spur were removed.

Bickendan:
OR 223 and 39 do this as well.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page