1
News:
If you have any trouble registering for the forum, please email travmap@teresco.org for help.
Recent Posts
2
General Web Design Discussion / Re: Overlay map color schemes
« Last post by michih on Today at 06:05:45 am »Both is fine for me. It took some time to figure out good color values back then.... See above. However, feel free to suggest better color values.
Edit: Topics merged.
Edit: Topics merged.
3
In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: How the work is split / who maintains what regions
« Last post by michih on Today at 06:04:16 am »ARG michih --> neroute2
BRA --> neroute2
BRA --> neroute2
4
In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: Rest of America Master Thread
« Last post by michih on Today at 06:02:31 am »argrn - Argentina Rutas Nacionales (michih -> neroute2) reviewer: t.b.d.
@neroute2 pleaes update the first post. Thanks
@neroute2 pleaes update the first post. Thanks
5
In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: argrn: Argentina Rutas Nacionales
« Last post by michih on Today at 06:01:09 am »No, it's mineIs it still yours, or can I do the work once I'm done with Brasil?
Go for it! I hope that the fucked up GSV behavior has been fixed meanwhile. Please consider the readme, especially the first point:
Quote
Unsigned GSJs should be named with RN9_U111 style. The U index could be anything, e.g. derived from the nearest km / mile post. See http://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=3620
Please threat the longest bitch out there well
6
Updates to Highway Data / SRB: Broken concurrencies
« Last post by michih on Today at 05:55:12 am »- E70 misses B10/B47 junction wp.
- E80's UliNis_E needs to be synced with B35's UliNis_E (as mentioned on github)
- E80's UliNis_E needs to be synced with B35's UliNis_E (as mentioned on github)
7
Solved Highway data updates / Re: SVK: II426 missing
« Last post by michih on Today at 05:48:48 am »In HB now: https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?r=svk.ii426
Marking solved.
Marking solved.
8
Other Discussion / Re: Project Statistics
« Last post by michih on Today at 05:43:13 am »We will have more than 60,000 routes in active+preview systems after the next site update.
We have more than 70,000 routes in active + preview systems now
We have more than 75,000 routes in active + preview systems now (75,222 routes for 1,555,070 miles).
We will have more than 80,000 routes in active + preview systems with the next site update.
We have more than 85,000 routes now (85,704 routes for 1,637,364 miles)
We have more than 90,000 routes now (90,314 routes for 1,671,624 miles)
95,074 routes for 1,759,640 miles now
9
Updates to Highway Data / Re: HI: Lots missing
« Last post by oscar on Today at 05:09:10 am »My point is that they merely refer to them as Route X. If they were a separate system, one would think they'd be treated differently.
The STIPs treat them as separate systems, by placing HDOT's projects for the state system under "state", and other projects under county jurisdiction (and being implemented, if at all, by county public works departments) under "County of ____" headings.
10
Updates to Highway Data / Re: CA: CA19 issues
« Last post by oscar on Today at 04:58:15 am »^ The Postmile Tool shows route 164 (which is signed as 19, if at all) as unrelinquished at least between Whittier Narrows and Rosemead.
I'm inclined to wait for 19, including the 164 segment(s), to be relinquished to death before removing it in toto from the HB. The route clearly is living on borrowed time, and is exactly the kind of route Caltrans wants gone from its system.
I have driven all of what's in the HB as route 19. There is spotty route 19 reassurance signage on the route itself, as well as some signage on intersecting freeways. I've seen zero 164 signage.
I'm inclined to wait for 19, including the 164 segment(s), to be relinquished to death before removing it in toto from the HB. The route clearly is living on borrowed time, and is exactly the kind of route Caltrans wants gone from its system.
I have driven all of what's in the HB as route 19. There is spotty route 19 reassurance signage on the route itself, as well as some signage on intersecting freeways. I've seen zero 164 signage.