Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: Duke87 on March 11, 2024, 05:24:23 pm

Title: AUT: B65 / B319
Post by: Duke87 on March 11, 2024, 05:24:23 pm

B65 needs to be split into two routes. The segment that's also mapped as B319 (https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?units=miles&u=null&r=aut.b319) is only signed as B319 and not as B65 (can confirm by field check).

Title: Re: AUT: B65 / B319
Post by: neroute2 on March 11, 2024, 06:20:26 pm

But it's signed on either end of B319? Sounds like an "unsigned but implied" overlap, despite the strangeness of B319 only existing there: https://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/hwydata.php

Title: Re: AUT: B65 / B319
Post by: michih on March 13, 2024, 12:09:30 pm

Exactly. It's an implied multiplex. I think that mapcat and me defined the same logic back then. From the top of my head: We keep it as one route if the routing is clear, the number is not changing on the concurrency, and if the overlap is not noticeably longer than the shortest remainder. I rawly followed that "unwritten rule".

B65 is an implied multiplex according to that. Closing.