Travel Mapping
Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: yakra on May 09, 2021, 07:07:20 pm
-
https://www.4029tv.com/article/the-end-is-near-bella-vista-bypass-ahead-of-schedule/36357026
Ahead of schedule and under budget
The road is still on track for a late Sept/Early Oct Opening
-
You're telling me the "Chinese Democracy" of Midwest construction is more than vaporware?
I think I'm going to need, like, triple confirmation when it actually happens. ;) :D
(Many metaphors died to bring you this post.)
-
Still vaporware. (A vaporway?)
Real Soon Now!
-
The ribbon cutting is scheduled for September 30th. (https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=30023.0)
-
Open to traffic October 1 (ostensibly 2021).:
Bella Vista Bypass to open Oct. 1 as part of Interstate 49
The Arkansas Department of Transportation (ArDOT) announced Friday (Sept. 17) the Bella Vista Bypass, or Missouri-Arkansas Connector, will open to traffic on Oct. 1. The completed highway will become a part of Interstate 49.
At 10 a.m. on Sept. 30, a ribbon-cutting celebration will take place to mark the completion of the 18.9-mile project. According to a news release, the new I-49 segment consisted of six projects totaling more than $220 million beginning in February 2011. Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson and Missouri Gov. Mike Parson will join state officials and legislators at the Arkansas-Missouri state line for the celebration.
https://talkbusiness.net/2021/09/bella-vista-bypass-to-open-oct-1-as-part-of-interstate-49/
-
Sadly, I was there just last week and have no plans to return to the area any time soon.
-
Future AR/MO point, that I've put in my MO I-49 file and will send when I get the St. Louis stuff figured out:
AR/MO http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=36.499536&lon=-94.382664
-
Supposedly has just opened up to traffic.
https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=3239.msg2666457#msg2666457
-
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/5171 includes the Bella Vista Bypass (https://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=4314) and most of the STL changes (https://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=4576).
I-49: I removed the +0 AltLabel, as it's not needed for a freshly-added waypoint.
MO90: Committed as submitted. GooHolRd is now no longer needed for shaping, and many of the hidden points could be converted to visible or deleted.
Highway63, how do the changes (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/5171/files) look?
-
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/5171 includes the Bella Vista Bypass (https://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=4314)
AR-72 wasn't updated. Still has the 'AR549(*)' labels for it's two intersections with I-49.
-
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/commit/bab9374b201958391c2ae2b21ef2bb819446ffba
-
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/5171 includes the Bella Vista Bypass (https://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=4314) and most of the STL changes (https://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=4576).
I-49: I removed the +0 AltLabel, as it's not needed for a freshly-added waypoint.
MO90: Committed as submitted. GooHolRd is now no longer needed for shaping, and many of the hidden points could be converted to visible or deleted.
Highway63, how do the changes (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/5171/files) look?
Appears to be good on my end. Leaving GooHolRd for now at least.