Author Topic: NY: NY 7, NY 23, NY 28, NY 80, and NY 205 Point Concerns  (Read 1169 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3098
  • Last Login:Today at 11:43:31 am
NY: NY 7, NY 23, NY 28, NY 80, and NY 205 Point Concerns
« on: October 08, 2021, 06:52:41 pm »
NY 7: 
1.   Is UndDr a viable point?
2.   BelRd should be BeiRd (if a viable point). 
3.   Is FonAve a viable point?  (also affects NY 23)
4.   CheSt should be CheSt_E or MainSt_S. (also affects NY 23)
5.   NY23_S should be NY23_E.

NY 23:
1.   Maybe making WestSt CR15A will allow WestSt_One to be suffixless.
2.   See 3-4 under NY 7.
3.   NY28 should be NY28_S.

NY 28:
1.   MerDavRd should be CR10.
2.   NY23 should be NY23_E.
3.   Is TheCir a viable point?

NY 80:
1.   Maybe make NY28/205 NY28_N.
2.   LakeSt should be LakeSt_E.

NY 205:  Maybe add points in Laurens and Hartwick due to the distances between points on this route.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4234
  • Last Login:April 07, 2024, 11:18:57 pm
  • I like C++
Re: NY: NY 7, NY 23, NY 28, NY 80, and NY 205 Point Concerns
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2021, 04:12:04 pm »
NY 7: 
1.   Is UndDr a viable point?
2.   BelRd should be BeiRd (if a viable point). 
Both are visible shaping points; leaving them in. BelRd changed to BeiRd.

3.   Is FonAve a viable point?  (also affects NY 23)
Looks like this was probably included as a visible shaping point. Removed, as the routes are still within tolerance without it.
As an aside, this is pretty cool; haven't seen it done before. Well, in NY at least. Wanna say it's been done in NJ, though I've not seen one with 2 shields.

4.   CheSt should be CheSt_E or MainSt_S. (also affects NY 23)
Changed to MainSt_S.

5.   NY23_S should be NY23_E.

NY 23:
1.   Maybe making WestSt CR15A will allow WestSt_One to be suffixless.
2.   See 3-4 under NY 7.
3.   NY28 should be NY28_S.

NY 28:
1.   MerDavRd should be CR10.
2.   NY23 should be NY23_E.
All of these are implemented.

3.   Is TheCir a viable point?
Visible shaping point.

NY 80:
1.   Maybe make NY28/205 NY28_N.
2.   LakeSt should be LakeSt_E.
Done & done.

NY 205:  Maybe add points in Laurens and Hartwick due to the distances between points on this route.
+X01 replaced with a visble point at ShaTownRd.
CR11 added in Hartwick.

On that latter item, I see a lot of VISIBLE_DISTANCE cropping up in NY when I put routes into wptedit.
I'm going to temporarily re-enable it for active systems and see what I come up with.
Edit: 9 eliminated; 1 left.

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/5193
« Last Edit: October 09, 2021, 05:57:33 pm by yakra »
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3098
  • Last Login:Today at 11:43:31 am
Re: NY: NY 7, NY 23, NY 28, NY 80, and NY 205 Point Concerns
« Reply #2 on: October 10, 2021, 09:56:18 pm »
Well it looks like this may have caused a duplicate label error on NY 23...

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4234
  • Last Login:April 07, 2024, 11:18:57 pm
  • I like C++
Re: NY: NY 7, NY 23, NY 28, NY 80, and NY 205 Point Concerns
« Reply #3 on: October 10, 2021, 11:59:48 pm »
Close, it was operation NYCR! ;)
Fixed locally.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca