Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: michih on January 03, 2023, 02:33:04 pm

Title: FRA-NAQ: E606 truncation
Post by: michih on January 03, 2023, 02:33:04 pm
E606 officially (https://unece.org/DAM/trans/doc/2016/sc1/ECE-TRANS-SC1-2016-03-Rev1e.pdf) runs from Angoulème - Bordeaux. The logical end would be at the southern N141/E603 interchange (N10's exit 59). However, it was also signed up to 10km north of Angoulème, and we actually have a northern extension up to N10's exit 55: https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?r=franaq.e606

E606 signs mostly disappeared north of the eastern N141 branch (N10's exit 58) now:
- October 2017 (https://www.google.com/maps/@45.6936884,0.1701888,3a,75y,85.23h,98.11t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sGX1ckWrbb-Y4dIS94pkMVA!2e0!5s20171001T000000!7i13312!8i6656) => August 2018 (https://www.google.com/maps/@45.693677,0.1702267,3a,75y,85.23h,98.11t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sBLYDmSaocuPjVcAd8o2ocA!2e0!5s20180801T000000!7i13312!8i6656)
- July 2019 (https://www.google.com/maps/@45.7214475,0.1859676,3a,15.8y,26.36h,90.41t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s87G3o_yjKBk1occb2HYnRw!2e0!5s20190701T000000!7i16384!8i8192) => April 2021 (https://www.google.com/maps/@45.7214363,0.1859646,3a,27.2y,26.45h,91.03t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s5adYRRRDpvw58fdFczrU0g!2e0!5s20210401T000000!7i16384!8i8192)

It's still in place on N141's direction signs where E606 does not run on concurrency:
- October 2022 (https://www.google.com/maps/@45.6961388,0.1867203,3a,41.3y,299.66h,90.49t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sqAV5G37beHTd9CW7F1T8yA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) N141-westbound towards N10 northbound
- October 2022 (https://www.google.com/maps/@45.6748442,0.1393948,3a,34.5y,113.99h,99.89t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sW5B5vCw-GL8f9myqJQg4Wg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) N141-eastbound towards N10/N141 concurrency

Any concerns on truncating E606 to N10's exit 58 - or should I even truncate it to exit 59?
Title: Re: FRA-NAQ: E606 truncation
Post by: si404 on January 04, 2023, 05:33:02 am
Definitely truncate.

Exit 59 seems the more natural place for the new terminus, but if you reckon exit 58, then go with that.
Title: Re: FRA-NAQ: E606 truncation
Post by: michih on January 06, 2023, 05:31:14 am
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/6267