AR: Little Rock/Pine Bluff Point Concerns

[Markkos1992]

When yakra updates quicker than I expected.......

Anyway, restarting here:

US 70:  AshAve>-AshAve_E

US 167: 
1.  The ARDOT Functional Classification Map considers FR9906 as Gillette Trail.
2.  CR58 should be relocated north slightly.

AR 338: 
1.  A point should be added at Scott Hamilton Dr (direct connection to I-30).
2. Consider replacing the shaping point west of I-530 with a visible point.

US 79:
1. Consider changing US79Bus to US79BusPin.
2.  WabRd>-MagSt (also affects US 63)
3.  I am unsure JonRd is worth it as a visible point.
4.  Should OldUS79 be marked as closed?

[yakra]

US 79:
3.  I am unsure JonRd is worth it as a visible point.

Typo?

As for the rest:
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/7159/commits/bf67b62a1b26ce237b61e3a336a77188f18ec3c4

[Markkos1992]

Yeah I meant JonDr next to OldUS79.

[yakra]

Necessary shaping point. Removing it brings US79 out of tolerance.

[Markkos1992]

Necessary shaping point. Removing it brings US79 out of tolerance.

Hence why I used the wording visible point.  I would have just kept it as a hidden shaping point.

[yakra]

https://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/includepts.php#preferintersection

[mapcat]

I'm with Mark here. No need to make this visible. Who will ever need this point? I'm not saying that removing it is urgent, but if "prefer visible points always" is the only justification for giving this one a name, then the instructions in the manual deserve reconsideration.