Author Topic: AASHTO Fall 2023 Meeting  (Read 35088 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3307
  • Last Login:Today at 01:44:12 pm
Re: AASHTO Fall 2023 Meeting
« Reply #15 on: March 29, 2024, 01:25:03 pm »
New thread for US 78 (at least in TN):  https://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=6153.msg34126;topicseen#msg34126

I guess yakra is on another long hiatus, but I really would have liked any thread on this to be AR/TN.

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2067
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 09:08:47 pm
Re: AASHTO Fall 2023 Meeting
« Reply #16 on: March 31, 2024, 11:56:29 pm »
New thread for US 78 (at least in TN):  https://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=6153.msg34126;topicseen#msg34126

I guess yakra is on another long hiatus, but I really would have liked any thread on this to be AR/TN.

I modified it.

Offline SSOWorld

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
  • Last Login:November 27, 2024, 06:24:52 am
Re: AASHTO Fall 2023 Meeting
« Reply #17 on: April 12, 2024, 05:16:20 pm »
Drove OK 152, Kilpatrick and Kickapoo today.  Goog, Waze and OSM have them marked as the new numbers. 

Guess what...

No signs!!! (don't expect them for several months. :pan: )

we wait...
Completed:
* Systems: DC, WI
* by US State: AK: I; AZ: I; AR: I; DE: I; DC: I, US, DC; HI: I; IL: I; IN: I*; IA: I, KS: I; MD: I, MA: I, MI: I; MN: I; MO: I; NE: I; NJ, I; ND: I; OH: I; OK: I; PA: I; RI: I; SD: I; WA: I; WV: I; WI: I,US,WI;

*Previously completed

Offline si404

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2070
  • Last Login:Today at 01:45:13 pm
Re: AASHTO Fall 2023 Meeting
« Reply #18 on: April 12, 2024, 05:41:06 pm »
Drove OK 152, Kilpatrick and Kickapoo today.  Goog, Waze and OSM have them marked as the new numbers.
Almost certainly one over-zealous editor changing (at least) one of them, then the others got changed thanks to citogenesis.

Offline SSOWorld

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
  • Last Login:November 27, 2024, 06:24:52 am
Re: AASHTO Fall 2023 Meeting
« Reply #19 on: April 12, 2024, 05:52:17 pm »
Side note - Interesting they chose I-344 when OK 344 exists in Tulsa (Gilcrease Expressway)
Completed:
* Systems: DC, WI
* by US State: AK: I; AZ: I; AR: I; DE: I; DC: I, US, DC; HI: I; IL: I; IN: I*; IA: I, KS: I; MD: I, MA: I, MI: I; MN: I; MO: I; NE: I; NJ, I; ND: I; OH: I; OK: I; PA: I; RI: I; SD: I; WA: I; WV: I; WI: I,US,WI;

*Previously completed

Offline SSOWorld

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
  • Last Login:November 27, 2024, 06:24:52 am
Re: AASHTO Fall 2023 Meeting
« Reply #20 on: April 12, 2024, 05:52:59 pm »
Drove OK 152, Kilpatrick and Kickapoo today.  Goog, Waze and OSM have them marked as the new numbers.
Almost certainly one over-zealous editor changing (at least) one of them, then the others got changed thanks to citogenesis.
Goog was in before OSM was unfortunately.
Completed:
* Systems: DC, WI
* by US State: AK: I; AZ: I; AR: I; DE: I; DC: I, US, DC; HI: I; IL: I; IN: I*; IA: I, KS: I; MD: I, MA: I, MI: I; MN: I; MO: I; NE: I; NJ, I; ND: I; OH: I; OK: I; PA: I; RI: I; SD: I; WA: I; WV: I; WI: I,US,WI;

*Previously completed

Offline si404

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2070
  • Last Login:Today at 01:45:13 pm
Re: AASHTO Fall 2023 Meeting
« Reply #21 on: April 12, 2024, 06:02:09 pm »
Side note - Interesting they chose I-344 when OK 344 exists in Tulsa (Gilcrease Expressway)
340 was available, no?

Unless they want to use that for the Muskagee?

Offline SSOWorld

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
  • Last Login:November 27, 2024, 06:24:52 am
Re: AASHTO Fall 2023 Meeting
« Reply #22 on: April 12, 2024, 06:02:57 pm »
Already has a state route number (OK-351)
Completed:
* Systems: DC, WI
* by US State: AK: I; AZ: I; AR: I; DE: I; DC: I, US, DC; HI: I; IL: I; IN: I*; IA: I, KS: I; MD: I, MA: I, MI: I; MN: I; MO: I; NE: I; NJ, I; ND: I; OH: I; OK: I; PA: I; RI: I; SD: I; WA: I; WV: I; WI: I,US,WI;

*Previously completed

Offline si404

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2070
  • Last Login:Today at 01:45:13 pm
Re: AASHTO Fall 2023 Meeting
« Reply #23 on: April 12, 2024, 07:19:20 pm »
Drove OK 152, Kilpatrick and Kickapoo today.  Goog, Waze and OSM have them marked as the new numbers.
Almost certainly one over-zealous editor changing (at least) one of them, then the others got changed thanks to citogenesis.
Goog was in before OSM was unfortunately.
the Goog is full of issues like this. Random AI/Person in a desk in a place where labour is really cheap receives a request, backed up with a source. They approve.

London's transit layer repeatedly loses the Elizabeth line and regains it (as it's not part of the London Underground, but also it's a key part of the TfL network) and Battersea Power Station tube station flicks between being shown on the map as 'Battersea Power' and the correct name because of a few transit YouTubers' in jokes meaning people who've likely never been to London (and are probably 13) file corrections that Google accepts based on the source due to them having little-to-no knowledge of the issue and no ability to detect sarcasm and then someone else corrects with better sources and there's little to no cross referencing.

Think the jokey edits on Wikipedia without the dedicated (and often humourless) people reverting them. At least these Interstate numbers are real and the issue is it not yet being signed (cf the AARW on I-515, where it's a redirect to I-11, even though it's premature).

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3307
  • Last Login:Today at 01:44:12 pm
Re: AASHTO Fall 2023 Meeting
« Reply #24 on: June 01, 2024, 04:49:36 pm »
New thread created for the deletion of US 31 BUS (Pentwater, MI):  https://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=6258.0

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4422
  • Last Login:Today at 01:57:14 am
  • I like C++
Re: AASHTO Fall 2023 Meeting
« Reply #25 on: June 26, 2024, 02:22:24 pm »
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline si404

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2070
  • Last Login:Today at 01:45:13 pm
Re: AASHTO Fall 2023 Meeting
« Reply #26 on: October 23, 2024, 03:50:44 am »
  • Item 18: North Carolina, US 70 Relocation of route
    Description: US 70 is proposed to be relocated due to approval of I-42 along an existing portion of US 70 between I-40 and US70 Business. The route is going along existing US 70 Business in Wake and Johnston Counties. The route is traveling along a multi-lane, divided facility going through the municipalities of Garner and Clayton. The route will cover approximately 11.88 miles, and will end at US 70/US 70 Business interchange.
  • Item 19: North Carolina, US 70B Deletion of route
    Description: US 70 Business is proposed to be eliminated as part of the relocation of US 70. The route begins at I-40/US 70 interchange in Garner. The route is traveling along a multi-lane, divided facility, going east through the municipalities of Garner and Clayton. The route is approximately 11.88 miles, and ends at the US 70/US 70 Business interchange south of Clayton in Johnston County.
Presumably with I-42 on the Clayton Bypass being in our browser, the rerouting of US70 and the related truncation of US70B should also be implemented?

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3307
  • Last Login:Today at 01:44:12 pm
Re: AASHTO Fall 2023 Meeting
« Reply #27 on: October 23, 2024, 06:36:42 am »
  • Item 18: North Carolina, US 70 Relocation of route
    Description: US 70 is proposed to be relocated due to approval of I-42 along an existing portion of US 70 between I-40 and US70 Business. The route is going along existing US 70 Business in Wake and Johnston Counties. The route is traveling along a multi-lane, divided facility going through the municipalities of Garner and Clayton. The route will cover approximately 11.88 miles, and will end at US 70/US 70 Business interchange.
  • Item 19: North Carolina, US 70B Deletion of route
    Description: US 70 Business is proposed to be eliminated as part of the relocation of US 70. The route begins at I-40/US 70 interchange in Garner. The route is traveling along a multi-lane, divided facility, going east through the municipalities of Garner and Clayton. The route is approximately 11.88 miles, and ends at the US 70/US 70 Business interchange south of Clayton in Johnston County.
Presumably with I-42 on the Clayton Bypass being in our browser, the rerouting of US70 and the related truncation of US70B should also be implemented?

Signage will not be complete on this until some time early next year.  I am on the side of holding off on this for now. (https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?msg=2940434)

Offline si404

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2070
  • Last Login:Today at 01:45:13 pm
Re: AASHTO Fall 2023 Meeting
« Reply #28 on: October 23, 2024, 06:50:22 am »
Signage will not be complete on this until some time early next year.  I am on the side of holding off on this for now. (https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?msg=2940434)
I was quite surprised the Clayton bypass segment of I-42 is in the browser already because of that date for signage completion.

Given that this change is
1) the simple removal of banner plates
2) the swapping of US70 shields for I-42 shields (including on BGS)

I find it strange our browser views the harder #2 done, but not the easier #1. Surely it's both or neither are done?

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3307
  • Last Login:Today at 01:44:12 pm
Re: AASHTO Fall 2023 Meeting
« Reply #29 on: October 23, 2024, 07:15:15 am »
It is a bit of number two with new signs at the moment (the most notable I-42 EB shields coming from the newly opened NC 540 EB and new signs on I-40).  https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?msg=2944603