Author Topic: mexf: Mexico federal routes  (Read 8984 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3936
  • Last Login:Today at 04:17:36 pm
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #30 on: March 24, 2020, 03:57:53 pm »
Quote
ABORTING due to 3 errors:
1: Abbrev >3 characters in mexf.csv line: [mexf;MEX-COAH;MEX57;;Cañ;Cañada Ancha;mexcoah.mex057can;], Cañ
2: Could not find Route matching root mexcoah.mex057can in system mexf.
3: No roots in mexf_con.csv line [mexf;MEX57;;Saltillo - Santa Cruz, COAH;mexcoah.mex057can]
[/size]
The ñ appears to be a (unicode, UTF-whatever, etc.) multi-byte character. The database barfs on it, and so does the HB.
Since Region + " " + Route + Banner + Abbrev concatenated together = our .list name, we need to stick with standard Latin characters all users can easily type into a .list.

Cañ -> Can
« Last Edit: March 24, 2020, 04:05:42 pm by yakra »
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Online neroute2

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 726
  • Last Login:Today at 09:46:31 pm
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #31 on: March 24, 2020, 09:33:06 pm »
Fixed in my version.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3936
  • Last Login:Today at 04:17:36 pm
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #32 on: March 26, 2020, 05:09:50 pm »
I messed up the HB link above. Should be
travelmapping.net/hb/?r=mexcoah.mex057can .
This .list name still appears mangled though.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Online neroute2

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 726
  • Last Login:Today at 09:46:31 pm
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #33 on: March 26, 2020, 05:16:11 pm »
Probably because I haven't done a pull request since then. Tonight should add more routes and this fix.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3936
  • Last Login:Today at 04:17:36 pm
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #34 on: March 28, 2020, 11:07:16 am »
Yes. I was mostly referring to how the HB in the initial link looked as mangled as it did due to my error in producing said link.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3882
  • Last Login:Today at 02:04:23 pm
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #35 on: May 23, 2020, 12:06:11 pm »
I think that the tier should be changed from 2 to 3 or 4*.
mexsf and mexed should be tier 2. Freeways and expressways are higher categories.

* Does the international naca system also cover Mexico? If so, mexf should be tier 4, and the state route systems tier 5. If not, tier 3 is fine.

Online neroute2

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 726
  • Last Login:Today at 09:46:31 pm
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #36 on: May 23, 2020, 12:22:41 pm »
I think that the tier should be changed from 2 to 3 or 4*.
mexsf and mexed should be tier 2. Freeways and expressways are higher categories.
I numbered it the same as usaus.

* Does the international naca system also cover Mexico? If so, mexf should be tier 4, and the state route systems tier 5. If not, tier 3 is fine.
It does not.

Offline mapcat

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1403
  • Last Login:Today at 11:16:55 am
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #37 on: May 23, 2020, 02:28:47 pm »
I think these are categorized correctly.
Clinched:

Offline vdeane

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 341
  • Gender: Female
  • Last Login:Today at 09:20:35 pm
    • New York State Roads
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #38 on: May 23, 2020, 05:46:06 pm »
I agree with keeping it as-is.  Not every country needs to follow the Euro model.
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

Offline SSOWorld

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 07:13:11 am
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #39 on: May 23, 2020, 09:56:19 pm »
Mexico Federal == US Routes.
It's the expressways (Mexico D) that equal tier 1.  State routes are lower tier (4) - and should be whether freeway or not.
Completed:
* Systems: DC, WI
* by US State: AR: I&; AZ: I; DE: I; DC: I, US, DC; IL: I; IN: I*; IA: I, KS: I; MD: I, MA: I, MI: I; MN: I; MO: I*; NE: I; NJ, I; OH: I; RI: I; SD: I; WA: I; WV: I; WI: I,US,WI; (AR, IN pending expansions.)

*Previously completed

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3882
  • Last Login:Today at 02:04:23 pm
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #40 on: May 24, 2020, 01:59:06 am »
It's the expressways (Mexico D) that equal tier 1.

yep, that's why I think they should be tier 2. That USA + CAN don't have such a expressway system doesn't mean that other countries don't have it.

Offline SSOWorld

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 07:13:11 am
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #41 on: May 24, 2020, 07:41:45 am »
It's the expressways (Mexico D) that equal tier 1.

yep, that's why I think they should be tier 2. That USA + CAN don't have such a expressway system doesn't mean that other countries don't have it.
No - disagree - Mexico D is freeway (Tolled) and are equivalent to a motorway in Europe or Interstate/ON 400/QC Autoroute in USA/CAN in the scheme.  Mexico is behind USA and CAN like much of Eastern Europe is behind its western counterparts.

North America != Europe.
Completed:
* Systems: DC, WI
* by US State: AR: I&; AZ: I; DE: I; DC: I, US, DC; IL: I; IN: I*; IA: I, KS: I; MD: I, MA: I, MI: I; MN: I; MO: I*; NE: I; NJ, I; OH: I; RI: I; SD: I; WA: I; WV: I; WI: I,US,WI; (AR, IN pending expansions.)

*Previously completed