Author Topic: fraoccdXX: Occitanie Routes Départementales  (Read 3900 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3733
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 03:49:53 pm
Re: fraoccdXX: Occitanie Routes Départementales
« Reply #30 on: December 22, 2021, 02:29:55 pm »
fraoccm31 - Toulouse Métropole Routes Métropolitaines will be in preview with the next site update. More than 100 routes for more than 250 miles.

It's the last system in Occitanie! All will be ready for peer-review from tomorrow :)
« Last Edit: December 22, 2021, 02:37:05 pm by michih »

Offline si404

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1682
  • Last Login:Today at 02:23:31 am
Re: fraoccdXX: Occitanie Routes Départementales
« Reply #31 on: September 22, 2022, 06:45:51 am »
fraoccm31 - Toulouse Métropole Routes Métropolitaines will be in preview with the next site update. More than 100 routes for more than 250 miles.

It's the last system in Occitanie! All will be ready for peer-review from tomorrow :)
After gestating for 9 months...

Toulouse Métropole Routes Métropolitaines:

M1, M1Dre, M1C, M1D, M1E, M2, M2Ore, M2A, M2B, M2C, M4 - fine

M4ToS - D4/D4C -> D4?

M4D, M14*, M14A, M15 - fine

M15Cug - check D15_Vil location as a relatively long way NE of where OSM has the municipal boundary

M15Mon, M15C, M16, M16F, M18*, M18D, M20*, M23, M24*, M24CuE, M24CuW, M24C, M24D - fine

M35A - check D35A location (surely at municipal boundary at Chemin de Peyre d'Escale?)

M37 - check D37_Dau and D37_Leg locations (surely Daux/Mondonville and Brax/Leguevin borders rather than somewhere random a significant (rather than slight) distance away from them?)

M37F - fine

*routes with stars have transitions to D roads near, but not on, OSM municipal boundaries. Mentioned only when significantly off. I'm going to hold off continuing until this issue is addressed, as it's my main complaint and so if the transition points are confirmed as being in the right place, or moved to the right place, then the review will go a lot quicker.

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3733
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 03:49:53 pm
Re: fraoccdXX: Occitanie Routes Départementales
« Reply #32 on: September 22, 2022, 12:27:09 pm »
*routes with stars have transitions to D roads near, but not on, OSM municipal boundaries. Mentioned only when significantly off. I'm going to hold off continuing until this issue is addressed, as it's my main complaint and so if the transition points are confirmed as being in the right place, or moved to the right place, then the review will go a lot quicker.

As notified in README.md, there is an official data set for the Haute Garonne (fraoccd31) routes. They are excluding the M routes, thus I had "border points" between the D and M routes. Unfortunately, https://www.teresco.org/tmtools_demos/gisplunge/FRA/Haute_Garonne/ is not available anymore but the latest files (like Haute Garonne) are available under /home/www/yakra/tmtools_demos/gisplunge/FRA/Haute_Garonne though. There should be one file per route, e.g. one wpt file for D1 which has an interuption for M1. However, there are 56 D1 file and only my local copy is one-file. I don't remember how @yakra provided the files to me which I actually used.

Offline si404

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1682
  • Last Login:Today at 02:23:31 am
Re: fraoccdXX: Occitanie Routes Départementales
« Reply #33 on: Yesterday at 01:00:17 pm »
I'm going to continue, and won't bother with the border points, on the assumption that they will be investigated.

M50, M50Tou, M50D, M50E, M54 - all fine

M57 - does it extend east along M66 to D57?

M57Ore - fine

M59 - M14_E/W -> M14_N/S ?

M59A, M59B, M59E, M61 - all fine

M63 - M2_W/E -> M2_N/S ?

M63A, M63B, M63E, M63G, M63H, M63J, M63W, M63WTou - all fine
M64, M64Aus, M64Bal, M64C, M64D, M64F, M65, M65B, M66, M66D, M66H, M68 - all fine
M70, M70A, M70B, M70E, M70G, M70W, M77, M77Bea, M77A, M77C, M77F, M77G - all fine
M82, M82C, M94, M112, M113 - all fine

M113A - the eastern end is a complex junction. Does the M113A reach the A61? Does the M916 reach the A620? The current situation of mapping both M roads ending at a roundabout with ramps from both Autoroutes (and labelling it on both as the M road, not the higher status A road they haven't had a junction with) seems poor.

M113AToW, M120 - both fine

M120A - M923/D980 -> M923/M980

M120N, M126, M188, M632, M632W, M820, M824, M826, M888, M901, M902 - all fine

M904B - add point for Rue Leon Jounaux to match point on M63W

M914 - fine

M916
 - M113A -> A620 and move? (see M113A)
 - add point for GSJ with Rue des Cosmonautes

M923 - fine

M924 - N124 -> N224

M924A, M964, M980 - all fine

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3733
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 03:49:53 pm
Re: fraoccdXX: Occitanie Routes Départementales
« Reply #34 on: Yesterday at 03:24:50 pm »
I'm going to continue, and won't bother with the border points, on the assumption that they will be investigated.

Investigated by whom? I positioned non-region-border-wps to the best of my knowledge when drafting the routes. At shp file location, at a sign, at a km post/stone, change in pavement or - if no other source - where OSM indicates the border. Not so accurate from the very beginning (first systems drafted) but OCC routes for sure. I'm not sure how important the exact locations are as long as they are between the right junction wps. I agree on region (especially country) border location accuracy but departement borders are less important IMO. I won't check them again as I spent a lot of time on it when drafting.

Edit: It's "funny" (= sad) that shp file locations (most reliable source) are often not confirmed by actual situation on-site (GSV) :(
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 03:50:11 pm by michih »