11
Updates to Highway Data / Re: VA: VA 16 Point Concerns
« Last post by Markkos1992 on Yesterday at 11:31:47 pm »Quote
5. SteCreRd>-SleCreRd
Looks like this one was missed.
News:
If you have any trouble registering for the forum, please email travmap@teresco.org for help.
Recent Posts
Looks like this one was missed.
12
Updates to Highway Data / Re: VA: VA 348
« Last post by Markkos1992 on Yesterday at 11:25:25 pm »I guess you forgot to send the updated file for this one.
13
Updates to Highway Data / Re: VA: VA 387
« Last post by Markkos1992 on Yesterday at 11:16:51 pm »Most importantly, US 23 needs a point at VA387Mou.
Also please clarify that the label names are correct. GSV is confusing me at best with what little we have.
Also please clarify that the label names are correct. GSV is confusing me at best with what little we have.
14
Updates to Highway Data / Re: VA: US 23 Corridor Point Concerns
« Last post by Markkos1992 on Yesterday at 11:11:48 pm »VA 74:
1. KenAve>-KenAve_W
I still think this one should be done.
15
Other Discussion / Re: Mileage Issues
« Last post by neroute2 on Yesterday at 11:03:31 pm »I ate them. 😋
16
Other Discussion / Mileage Issues
« Last post by Markkos1992 on Yesterday at 10:33:49 pm »How come most mileage statistics have all of a sudden ended up at 0?
17
Updates to Highway Data / Re: NC: Various Point Concerns Around Charlotte and along NC 16 and US 21
« Last post by Markkos1992 on Yesterday at 09:03:40 pm »US 29:
1. GraSt>-GraSt_N
2. TrySt>-TrySt_S
US 64: I think that technically NC90Tay_E should be NC90_TayE.
US 421 BUS (North Wilkesboro): NC18/273_S>-CBDLoop
NC 121: I think you should have gone with just MainSt instead of MainSt_S unless Main St is being applied on all of NC 121 that is not on Wesley Church Rd.
1. GraSt>-GraSt_N
2. TrySt>-TrySt_S
US 64: I think that technically NC90Tay_E should be NC90_TayE.
US 421 BUS (North Wilkesboro): NC18/273_S>-CBDLoop
NC 121: I think you should have gone with just MainSt instead of MainSt_S unless Main St is being applied on all of NC 121 that is not on Wesley Church Rd.
18
In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: usatr: United States select tourist routes
« Last post by mapcat on Yesterday at 04:36:04 pm »Here are a few more items I hope to get in before the deadline (is there still a deadline?)
In Indiana, for the main Lincoln Hwy between IN2_ValW & IN2_ValE, it looks like a shaping point is missing, since this segment is a loop that deviates from IN 2.
Nearby, the segment from IN2_WesS to US6 is impossible to drive because Lowman Lane is barricadedin front of the cemetery. It takes 1100W instead.
In Illinois, on the National Rd, there's a spur (actually a loop, but signed as a spur) at Livingston, east of Marshall.
In Richmond, Indiana, the posted route is different from what we have. Eastbound it follows SW 1st St, and westbound it takes SE 3rd St between Main St and S A St. I couldn't find anything on SW 5th St.
Finally, in Ohio, on an unsigned stretch of the Ohio River Scenic Byway in Cincinnati, the short segment from US50_CT to US52_CT needs an intermediate point at Eastern Ave to show what appears to be a really short implied concurrency with US 50 Trk.
Signage on the ORSB does become more common farther east, and it disagrees with the drafted route between the HobDr and US33 points. West of Middleport it leaves OH 7, eventually making its way to OH 833 and OH 124, following 124 through Racine, where it reconnects with the route we have. I couldn't find any signage on Tornado Rd.
Closer to 33, an ORSB spur is signed along CR 338A, evidently called the Great Bend Road route.
In Indiana, for the main Lincoln Hwy between IN2_ValW & IN2_ValE, it looks like a shaping point is missing, since this segment is a loop that deviates from IN 2.
Nearby, the segment from IN2_WesS to US6 is impossible to drive because Lowman Lane is barricadedin front of the cemetery. It takes 1100W instead.
In Illinois, on the National Rd, there's a spur (actually a loop, but signed as a spur) at Livingston, east of Marshall.
In Richmond, Indiana, the posted route is different from what we have. Eastbound it follows SW 1st St, and westbound it takes SE 3rd St between Main St and S A St. I couldn't find anything on SW 5th St.
Finally, in Ohio, on an unsigned stretch of the Ohio River Scenic Byway in Cincinnati, the short segment from US50_CT to US52_CT needs an intermediate point at Eastern Ave to show what appears to be a really short implied concurrency with US 50 Trk.
Signage on the ORSB does become more common farther east, and it disagrees with the drafted route between the HobDr and US33 points. West of Middleport it leaves OH 7, eventually making its way to OH 833 and OH 124, following 124 through Racine, where it reconnects with the route we have. I couldn't find any signage on Tornado Rd.
Closer to 33, an ORSB spur is signed along CR 338A, evidently called the Great Bend Road route.
19
In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: autl3: Lower Austria Landesstraßen L
« Last post by michih on Yesterday at 03:52:45 pm »If temporarily split the system into 9 systems. Thus, the routes from L2 thru L2316 are already in preview now.
https://travelmapping.net/hb/index.php?sys=autl3
https://travelmapping.net/hb/index.php?sys=autl31 (temp system)
https://travelmapping.net/hb/index.php?sys=autl32 (temp system)
https://travelmapping.net/hb/index.php?sys=autl3
https://travelmapping.net/hb/index.php?sys=autl31 (temp system)
https://travelmapping.net/hb/index.php?sys=autl32 (temp system)
20
General Web Design Discussion / Re: showroute's .list tool: when to enable it?
« Last post by michih on Yesterday at 05:13:40 am »Any additional thoughts on this? Should we start a poll to come to a decision?