« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: ND: Bismarck Expressway (usasf)  (Read 565 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline the_spui_ninja

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 736
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 09:46:47 am
  • THE Western SD Highway Nut
ND: Bismarck Expressway (usasf)
« on: April 12, 2024, 11:20:30 am »
Quote from: neroute2 on April 11, 2024, 12:07:54 am
There is also one on ND 810 in Bismarck (west end, east end). Finally this freeway gets added :)

Don't know why I never added this to usasf before. I'm planning to add in the freeway segment (west of Washington Street); should I add it as nd.nd810 (only to I-194) or as nd.bisexpy (all the way to I-94)?
Logged
An adventure is only an inconvenience rightly considered. An inconvenience is only an adventure wrongly considered. - G.K. Chesterton

Offline vdeane

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 396
  • Gender: Female
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 09:35:04 pm
    • New York State Roads
Re: ND: Bismarck Expressway (usasf)
« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2024, 12:52:55 pm »
nd.bisexpy would probably be best to match signage.
Logged
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

Offline the_spui_ninja

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 736
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 09:46:47 am
  • THE Western SD Highway Nut
Re: ND: Bismarck Expressway (usasf)
« Reply #2 on: April 12, 2024, 02:05:58 pm »
Quote from: vdeane on April 12, 2024, 12:52:55 pm
nd.bisexpy would probably be best to match signage.

That's what I thought too, just wanted to see if anyone was particular about the unsigned designation. Will add as nd.bisexpy unless there are objections.
Logged
An adventure is only an inconvenience rightly considered. An inconvenience is only an adventure wrongly considered. - G.K. Chesterton
Pages: [1]
« previous next »