If you have any trouble registering for the forum, please email travmap@teresco.org for help.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Jim on January 20, 2021, 10:18:40 amTurns out there was a misunderstanding on the memory, and it has not yet arrived.When the new memory arrives and noreaster has to go offline, I don't suppose you could humor me and do a round of memtest86 with the existing DIMMs?
Turns out there was a misunderstanding on the memory, and it has not yet arrived.
Oh fun. Sounds like you're not getting the full bandwidth benefit of n channels then?
Quote from: yakra on January 22, 2021, 02:32:36 amWhen the new memory arrives and noreaster has to go offline, I don't suppose you could humor me and do a round of memtest86 with the existing DIMMs? Can probably make that happen.
When the new memory arrives and noreaster has to go offline, I don't suppose you could humor me and do a round of memtest86 with the existing DIMMs?
Quote from: Jim on January 22, 2021, 07:32:11 amQuote from: yakra on January 22, 2021, 02:32:36 amWhen the new memory arrives and noreaster has to go offline, I don't suppose you could humor me and do a round of memtest86 with the existing DIMMs? Can probably make that happen.Did this happen?The mysterious C++ Pointer Value Loses 0x900000000 bug is back.It's weird enough that I can't write off bad memory as a potential cause.
Still waiting on those two DIMMs?