Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Topic started by: Markkos1992 on February 12, 2024, 01:26:50 pm

Title: IL: More Point Concerns After 9/2023 Trip
Post by: Markkos1992 on February 12, 2024, 01:26:50 pm
I-55 BL (Bloomington):  ForJesRd>-FortJesRd

US 24:
1.  Consider replacing ths shaping point between I-74 and US150/116 with a visible point.  (also affects US 150 and IL 116)
2.  CR6>-DeeMacRd (CR6 seems to be a secret designation)

US 66 His (Chicago): A visible point northeast of Atlanta should keep the line north of I-55.

US 150: 
(west of Illinois River, east to west)
1.  It looks like BriRd should be JefSt.
2.  Should DahRd be CR1720E (https://www.google.com/maps/@40.907845,-90.1139218,3a,25.4y,229.58h,86.79t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sS9G89LLmNYwu5aWWNMH-_w!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu)?
3.  HenSt>-HenRd
4.  Should CenAve be CR2 (https://www.google.com/maps/@41.1079043,-90.3805279,3a,75y,4.9h,74.42t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1szB0UyWhGzpKmuER2K11UNw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu)?
5.  Consider replacing the shaping points south and north of 11thAve with a visible point.
(east of Illinois River)
1.  Consider replacing the shaping point east of IL8_E with a visible point.
2.  Consider replacing the shaping point south of PerSt with a visible point at County Line Rd (CouLineRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@40.6157792,-89.3282739,3a,75y,235.01h,88.64t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sV-4nUVwu82-4JX6vNutR5Q!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu).
3.  Consider replacing the shaping points east of IL 117 with visible points.
4.  WasSt>-WasSt_W

IL 9:  US51>-US51Bus

IL 29: 
1.  Consider replacing the shaping point south of IL 6 with a visible point at the entrance to Detweiler Park.
2.  Consider replacing the shaping point north of CedHilDr with a visible point.
3.  Consider replacing the shaping point north of IL17_W with a visible point.
4.  Consider replacing the shaping points north of IL 18 and IL26_N with visible points.

IL 40:  Looking closely at GSV, you could make a case that SheRd should be GilLn, but I think I am fine with a no-build here.

IL 89: 
1.  I am unsure if the StaSt labels are correct.
2.  I am unsure if CR3 is correct.
3.  Consider replacing the shaping point north of CR3 with a visible point.
4.  Consider replacing the shaping points south of PlaRd with visible points.

IL 116:  CR19>-LouRd (https://www.google.com/maps/@40.771983,-89.4421801,3a,26.3y,108.69h,90.8t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sILFO76Qd4iOFynTUH1pRsg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu)
Title: Re: IL: More Point Concerns After 9/2023 Trip
Post by: Markkos1992 on February 15, 2024, 02:31:47 pm
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/7219/files#diff-f11ca5399436944225b574674b4ec64903396f919377b47b3eae4ab2ddc5e35c (shows the fix for IL 9)
Title: Re: IL: More Point Concerns After 9/2023 Trip
Post by: Markkos1992 on April 10, 2024, 12:20:19 pm
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/commit/0f0c28aca19e9d1fe5e2977437dfa5f85ab82ef8#diff-06a71c29408955070c1ebd1ed9d4b9a0fc425273ffd3bbfee5e7d24a7149391f (shows fixes for I-55 BL (Bloomington), US 24, US 66 His (Chicago), US 150 (east of Illinois River), and IL 116)