Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Updates to Highway Data / Re: blzar+blzd: Belize Roads
« Last post by neroute2 on Today at 01:19:45 am »
Given that we're not including every national route (no AR5) and by far not every district route, shouldn't these be 'select' systems?

The Public Roads Act from 2011 lists the following highways:
*Northern Highway (our AR2 Philip Goldson Highway, except listed as going thru Orange Walk; dharwood said the bypass is AR2-B) (not clear what it does at the Mexican border)
*Western Highway (our AR1 George Price Highway)
*Southern Highway (our AR4, except the south end is at Joe Taylor Bridge on the outskirts of Punta Gorda)
*Central American Boulevard (not in our data)
*Hummingbird Highway (our AR3)
*Belize International Airport Highway (not in our data)
*Hattieville/Burrell Boom/Northern Highway (our D200 Burrell Boom Road)
*Coastal Plain Highway (not in our data; apparently AR5) - this was recently improved and opened last year

This includes everything we have except the Orange Walk bypass. Since there are some signs for these (or other newer e.g. Philip Goldson Highway) names and none for the numbers, would it make sense to use the names instead?

Other roads that the feds had a hand in:
*Orange Walk Bypass (in the 2017 road maintenance budget, which lists all of ours plus Manatee Road AKA Coastal Plain Highway)
*Remate Bypass
*John Smith Road
*Sarteneja Road
2
Would a National Forest Scenic Byway be eligible for this? One that I think would be worth adding is the Mountain Loop Highway in Washington, which does have a few custom signs posted like so:

3
I made some point revisions for the Irwin section of the Lincoln Highway to clarify that it uses Old Trail Rd instead of Center Hwy (the parts that goes back south to US 30) west of Downtown Irwin.

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/7382

4
Solved Highway data updates / Re: MI: Add Points
« Last post by extremebandman on Yesterday at 05:00:23 pm »
Understood! I was able to clean it up when I visited so this is a non-issue on my end now. Thank you!
5
Updates to Highway Data / TX: US 380 TRUCK (Denton)
« Last post by CoreySamson on Yesterday at 04:30:42 pm »
On a drive yesterday I noticed this route on standalone shields which does not appear on TM:

https://maps.app.goo.gl/dsE1xNq9KQBaCf8t8
https://maps.app.goo.gl/pWfp6wgFBrkfcDBp8
https://maps.app.goo.gl/W6cmou4qDkreUK5RA

It appears that it runs from the I-35/US 380 interchange to the US 377/US 380/Loop 288 interchange via I-35 and Loop 288, though signage is iffy on the I-35 section. This is the westernmost shield I can find of it.
6
Best I can tell, it affects only ua747sp.list.
7
the only one I couldn't was from changing MEX15D to MEX15DCha (since the obvious longer route became MEX15D).

It's fine if the route had no traveler since the alt route name would not be necessary at all. If there was a traveler, you should undo it since it is an active system!
Look at the route and tell me why the short spur should be 15D and the long trunk should have a suffix.

To avoid breaking user list file entries!

There are occasionally reasons to break them, including this. It's not going to give anyone a highway they haven't driven; it will simply not give them a short piece until they update.
8
the only one I couldn't was from changing MEX15D to MEX15DCha (since the obvious longer route became MEX15D).

It's fine if the route had no traveler since the alt route name would not be necessary at all. If there was a traveler, you should undo it since it is an active system!
Look at the route and tell me why the short spur should be 15D and the long trunk should have a suffix.

To avoid breaking user list file entries!
9
There's a concurrency on MEX15DMex where I don't think there's supposed to be one. MEX15DMex's western terminus is correctly placed at the point where the central toll lanes separate from the free lanes (MEX15), but then the westernmost segment of MEX15DMex is shown to be concurrent with MEX15.
Fixed. Thanks.
10
the only one I couldn't was from changing MEX15D to MEX15DCha (since the obvious longer route became MEX15D).

It's fine if the route had no traveler since the alt route name would not be necessary at all. If there was a traveler, you should undo it since it is an active system!
Look at the route and tell me why the short spur should be 15D and the long trunk should have a suffix.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10