Author Topic: usapr: Puerto Rico Territorial Highways  (Read 12675 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mapcat

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1241
  • Last Login:Today at 11:10:54 am
Re: usapr: Puerto Rico Territorial Highways
« Reply #45 on: June 27, 2021, 08:56:14 am »
I saw your post in the grab-bag systems thread and didn't realize you had stopped your review to wait for me to respond. Sorry for the confusion. I'm waiting for the rest of the review before responding, since I intend to make all the changes at once. If you have a general question like "do you want me to keep looking for examples of this" of course I'll answer it before you finish, but I did not see any of those. Thank you for your work on this so far.
Clinched:

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1929
  • Last Login:Today at 02:01:15 pm
Re: usapr: Puerto Rico Territorial Highways
« Reply #46 on: June 27, 2021, 09:26:52 am »
My thought here was that there would not be much after PR 300, but I can move forward then ASAP if you just want to wait.  My nonwork schedule keeps getting busier so I will probably still put stuff related to personal travel above this for the time being. 

Offline mapcat

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1241
  • Last Login:Today at 11:10:54 am
Re: usapr: Puerto Rico Territorial Highways
« Reply #47 on: June 27, 2021, 12:22:07 pm »
I'm not in a big hurry but it would be nice to get this activated by the end of the year.
Clinched:

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1929
  • Last Login:Today at 02:01:15 pm
Re: usapr: Puerto Rico Territorial Highways
« Reply #48 on: July 07, 2021, 11:00:43 am »
I am trying to at least get through the 300s today.  I am unsure how far I will progress by the end of the month, but we will see.

PR 300:  Fine.
PR 301:  Is MirSal correct and at the right location?
PR 303:  Fine.
PR 304:  Fine.
PR 305:  Should PR116_N just be PR116?
PR 306:  Looks fine.  The Excel spreadsheet indicates that this goes east of PR 101 though.
PR 307:  Fine.
PR 308:  Should CllAgu_E be just CllAgu?
PR 309:  Am I missing something going on between PR 309 and PR 103?
PR 310:  Fine.
PR 311:  Fine.
PR 312:  Fine.
PR 313:  I think that CllSalMae should be CllSalMes.  Also is End at the right location?
PR 314:  Fine.
PR 315:  Is Cll65Inf_S correct?
PR 316:  Fine.
PR 317:  Fine.
PR 318:  Fine.
PR 319:  Fine.
PR 320:  Fine.
PR 321:  Fine.
PR 322:  Fine.
PR 323:  Fine.
PR 324:  Should VilPes be CllVilPes? Should CllRafHer be CllFlo?
PR 325:  Fine.
PR 326:  Fine.
PR 327:  Fine.
PR 328:  Fine.
PR 329:  Seems fine.  I am not 100% sure it goes to PR 117 though based on the map and spreadsheet.
PR 330:  Fine.
PR 331:  Fine.
PR 332:  Fine.
PR 333:  Should the section of PR 116 and PR 4116 be part of PR 4116 instead of PR 333?  What is up with FutPR334?
PR 334:  Fine.
PR 335:  Is PR 3335 missing?
PR 336:  Fine.
PR 337:  Fine.
PR 338:  Fine.
PR 339:  Fine.
PR 341:  Fine.
PR 342:  Replace the shaping point with CllG. 
PR 343:  Is a point missing at PR 345?  (looks like not after looking at PR 345)
PR 344:  Seems fine.
PR 345:  Should these two routes be combined?  (It is signed from PR 2.)  Also PR 3330 looks it it should be split on OSM, but it seems correct on Here Hybrid Day.
PR 346:  Fine.
PR 347:  CllReal should be AveReal.  I am not sure if the north end at PR 2 is done correctly.
PR 348:  It looks like CllLic is an incorrect label.  Is PR 380 missing from the HB?  It looks like the shaping point north of PR330 should be replaced with a visible point.
PR 349:  Is there a missing graph connection with PR 105? 
PR 351:  Fine.
PR 352:  Fine.
PR 353:  Is this route and PR 3353 in there correctly?  CamSecRDes may be off too.
PR 354:  I do not think that CllJonCar_E  is correct.
PR 355:  Does this route not extend to PR119?
PR 356:  Seems fine.
PR 357:  PR105_E should be PR105.
PR 358:  Seems fine.
PR 359:  Fine.
PR 360:  Fine.
PR 361:  Fine.
PR 362:  Fine.
PR 363:  Fine.
PR 364:  Seems fine.
PR 365 (Sabana Grande):  Is OSM's routing or the HB right?  I have no idea.
PR 365 (Maricao) :  I am unsure how to describe this one.  I am very much unsure if it is correct.
PR 366:  See PR 365 (Maricao).
PR 367:  Fine.
PR 368:  Fine.
PR 369:  Fine.
PR 370:  Fine.
PR 371:  CjonTor may not be correct.  Otherwise see PR 365.
PR 372:  Seems fine.
PR 373:  Seems fine.
PR 374 (Yauco):  Fine if PR 372 and PR 373 are fine.
PR 374 (Lares):  Fine.
PR 375:  Fine (see PR 377 though)
PR 376:  CjonFra needs to be corrected.  Otherwise seems fine.
PR 377:  Does this extend to PR 375?
PR 378:  Fine.
PR 379:  Fine.
PR 381:  Seems fine.
PR 382:  Fine.
PR 383:  Fine.
PR 384:  Fine.
PR 385:  Fine.
PR 386:  Should CamMar replace the nearby shaping point?
PR 387:  Seems fine.  Could this combine with PR 391 at some point?
PR 388:  Fine.
PR 389:  Should Cll2 be Cll3?
PR 390:  Fine.
PR 391:  Fine.
PR 392:  Seems fine. (unless PR 392 and PR 394 connect)
PR 393:  Seems fine.
PR 394:  Seems fine.    (see PR 392)
PR 396:  Fine.
PR 397:  Seems fine.
PR 398:  Seems fine.
PR 399:  Seems fine.
PR 400:  Fine.
PR 401:  Fine.
PR 402:  Fine.
PR 403:  Fine.
PR 404:  Seems fine.
PR 405:  Seems fine.
PR 406:  West end at PR 109 needs to be recentered.
PR 407:  Fine.
PR 408:  Fine.
PR 409:  Fine.
PR 410:  Fine.
PR 411:  PR115_S should be just PR115.
PR 412:  Are we sure that this route does not extend to PR 115?
PR 413:  Seems fine.
PR 414:  Fine.
PR 415:  Seems fine.

Starting 7-20-2021:
PR 416:  Signage seems to indicate that PR 416 may be concurrent with PR 417 in some form.
PR 417:  Does PR 417 actually extend it all the way to PR 411?
PR 418:  GSV at the northern end seems to indicate that PR 111 extends west of PR 2 to here or even PR 115.  Also could that shaping point be replaced with a visible point?
PR 419:  Fine.
PR 420:  Fine.
PR 421:  Fine.
PR 422:  Fine.
PR 423:  Seems fine.  It is odd that it ends at PR 4423.
PR 424:  Fine.
PR 425:  Fine.
PR 426:  Is the north end of PR 4431 at the right location?  (may require further realignment of PR 4431)
PR 427:  Seems fine.
PR 428:  This route seems like it may have been extended.
PR 429:  Fine.
PR 430:  Fine.
PR 431:  Fine.
PR 432:  Fine.
PR 433:  Fine.
PR 434:  Fine.
PR 435:  Fine.
PR 436:  Fine.
PR 437:  Fine.
PR 438:  Fine.
PR 439:  Fine.
PR 440:  Seems fine.
PR 441:  Seems fine.
PR 442:  Is the northern end at the right location?
PR 443:  Fine.
PR 444:  Fine.
PR 445:  Seems fine at the end of the day.
PR 446:  Should a point be added for an extension of PR 4476?
PR 447:  Fine.
PR 448:  Fine.
PR 449:  Fine.
PR 450:  Seems fine.
PR 451:  I am pretty sure that this should be extended to PR 111.
PR 452:  Fine.
PR 453:  Fine.
PR 454:  Fine.
PR 455:  Fine.
PR 456:  Is PR4486 at the right location?
PR 457:  Fine.
PR 458:  Seems fine.
PR 459:  Seems fine with the exception of wondering whether PR 463 makes it here yet.
PR 460:  Seems fine.
PR 461:  Fine.
PR 462:  Fine.
PR 463:  Probably fine beyond whether it makes it to PR 459 or not.
PR 464:  Fine.
PR 465:  Fine.
PR 466:  Is CllDelPena correct? (assuming this does not go to PR 113)
PR 467:  It looks like the PR107 point needs to be relocated.
PR 468:  Fine.
PR 469:  May be fine, could this extend to PR 2 by the baseball stadium?
PR 470:  Fine.
PR 471:  Fine.
PR 472:  Fine.
PR 473:  Seems fine.
PR 474:  Fine.
PR 475:  Fine.
PR 476:  Fine.
PR 477:  Fine.
PR 478:  Fine.
PR 479:  Fine.
PR 480:  Fine.
PR 481:  Fine.
PR 482:  Fine.
PR 483:  Fine.
PR 484:  Fine.
PR 485:  Does this make it to PR 119?  Who knows....
PR 486:  Is PR4486 at the right location?
PR 487:  Fine.
PR 488:  Fine.
PR 489:  Seems fine as long as PR 489R is not a thing.
PR 490:  Fine.
PR 491:  Fine.
PR 492:  Fine.
PR 493:  Seems fine.
PR 494:  Fine.
PR 495:  Is a point missing for PR 4403?
PR 496:  Fine.
PR 497:  Is End at the right location?
PR 498:  Fine.
PR 499:  Seems fine.
PR 500:  Seems fine.
PR 501 (Ponce(S)):  Seems fine.
PR 501 (Ponce(N)):  Seems fine.
PR 502:  Fine.
PR 503 (Adjuntas):  Is End at the right location?
PR 503 (Ponce):  Is the south end at the right location?
PR 504:  Is PR588 missing?
PR 505:  It looks like Cll1 should be CllA. 
PR 506:  Is End at the right location?
PR 508:  Fine.
PR 509:  Fine.
PR 510:  Fine.
PR 511:  Is End at the right location?
PR 512:  Is End at the right location?
PR 513:  Fine.
PR 514:  Does this actually extend north of PR 5514?
PR 515:  Fine.
PR 516:  Seems fine.
PR 517:  Is End at the right location?
PR 518:  Fine.
PR 518R:  Is End at the right location?
PR 519:  Seems fine.
PR 520:  Is LomRayo at the right location?
PR 521:  Fine.
PR 522:  Fine.
PR 523:  Fine.
PR 524:  Fine.
PR 525:  Fine.
PR 526:  CueCap should be slightly relocated.
PR 527:  Seems fine.
PR 528:  Seems fine if the shaping point south of PR 140 is correct.
PR 529:  Is End at the right location?
PR 530:  Is End at the right location?
PR 531:  I am not sure of the status on FutPR607.
PR 532:  Seems fine.
PR 533:  Fine.
PR 535:  It looks like Cll1 is not at a road.
PR 536:  Should PR 5536 be added?
PR 537:  Fine.
PR 538:  Cll3_W should be Cll6.
PR 539:  Fine.
PR 540:  Should this be extended to PR 551?
PR 541:  Fine.
PR 542:  Fine.
PR 543:  Seems fine.
PR 545:  Should the shaping point north of PR 52 be replaced with a visible point at AveJac?
PR 546:  Fine.
PR 547:  Is End at the right location?
PR 548:  Are the shaping point and End at the right location?
PR 549:  Fine.
PR 550:  Seems fine.
PR 551:  See PR 540.  Also does PR 5552 make it to this road?
PR 552:  Fine.
PR 553:  Fine.
PR 554:  Is this route legitimately missing?
PR 555:  Is End at the right location?
PR 556:  Seems fine.
PR 557:  Fine.
PR 558:  Fine.
PR 559:  Is End at the right location?
PR 560:  I think this route is in correctly.
PR 561:  Is End at the right location?
PR 562:  Is End at the right location?
PR 563:  Fine.
PR 564:  Fine.
PR 565:  Fine.
PR 566:  Fine.
PR 567:  Fine.
PR 568:  Replace the shaping point near PR 5155 with a visible one at SalMor.
PR 569:  Fine.
PR 570:  PR149 should be PR149_LomN.
PR 571:  Fine.
PR 572:  Is the south end at the correct location?
PR 573:  Should End be CllLasVer or CllVer?
PR 574:  Is End at the right location?
PR 575:  Seems fine.
PR 576:  Please clarify where PR 576 and PR 702 end.
PR 577:  Fine.
PR 578:  CllMar_E should be AveJoseDie_E.
PR 580:  Fine.
PR 581:  Fine.
PR 583:  Fine.
PR 584:  Fine.
PR 585:  Fine.
PR 586:  Is End at the right location?
PR 589:  The northern end of this word should be rechecked.
PR 590:  Fine.
PR 591:  CamClubTir should be AveLasBri.
PR 592:  Seems fine.  (unsure about PR 14 here and at PR 570 here)
PR 593:  Fine.
PR 595:  Fine.
PR 596:  Fine.
PR 597:  Fine.
PR 599:  Seems fine.
PR 600:  Fine.
PR 602:  Fine. 
PR 603:  Is End at the right location?
PR 604:  Fine.
PR 605:  Fine.
PR 606:  Does this route extend further south (possibly all the way to PR 140)?
PR 607:  See PR 531.
PR 608:  Seems fine.  See PR 614.
PR 610:  Is End at the right location?
PR 611:  Does this extend to PR 140?
PR 612:  Is End at the right location?
PR 613:  Fine.
PR 614:  Does this route extend west of PR 6614?
PR 615:  Seems fine.
PR 616:  Fine.
PR 617:  Seems fine.
PR 618:  Fine.
PR 619:  Fine.
PR 620:  Fine.
PR 621:  Is End at the right location?
PR 622:  Seems fine.
PR 623:  Seems fine.
PR 624:  Seems fine as this seems to sneak in there.
PR 625:  Seems fine.
PR 626:  Fine.
PR 627:  Is this route really concurrent with PR 638?
PR 628:  Seems fine.
PR 629:  Fine.
PR 630:  Seems fine.
PR 631:  Is End at the right location?
PR 632:  Is End at the right location?
PR 633:  Fine.
PR 634:  Fine.
PR 635:  Should PR 4489 connect to this road?  Is there a PR 635R?
PR 636:  Seems fine.
PR 637:  Fine.
PR 638:  See PR 627. Does the east end of PR 658 get to this route?
PR 639:  Fine.
PR 641:  Fine.
PR 642:  Seems fine.
PR 643:  Fine.
PR 644:  Is End at the right location?
PR 645:  Is CllSanVic correct?
PR 646:  Does this actually extend to PR 155 on its west end?
PR 647:  Are the PR 677 and PR 620 intersections that close to each other?
PR 648:  Is End at the right location?
PR 649:  Fine.
PR 650:  Fine.
PR 651:  Fine.
PR 652:  It looks like this may extend slightly east of PR 10.
PR 653:  Fine.
PR 655:  Is AreMue correct?
PR 656:  Fine.
PR 657:  Fine.
PR 658:  Seems fine.  It may extend farther south now.
PR 659:  Fine.
PR 660:  Is RmlBarObr_E correct?
PR 661:  Is End at the right location?
PR 662:  Seems fine.
PR 663:  Fine.
PR 664:  Fine.
PR 665:  Fine.
PR 666:  Fine.
PR 667:  Fine.
PR 668 (Manati (C)):  This route needs to be relooked at completely.  This may be PR 6668 and PR 6670 instead.
PR 668 (Manati (S)):  Fine.
PR 669:  Fine.
PR 670:  I am unsure of things west of PR 149. 
PR 671:  Should CllVegaJim be Cll5 if this road makes it that far?
PR 672:  Is end at the right location or does this extend to PR 643?
PR 673:  Seems fine.
PR 674:  Is AveAre correct?
PR 675:  Fine.
PR 676:  Fine.
PR 677 (Vega Alta):  I am unsure of the area around PR 6677.
PR 677 (Dorado):  Is this route in correctly?
PR 677 (Toa Alta):  Seems fine.
PR 678:  Fine.
PR 679:  Fine.
PR 680:  Is this route missing?
PR 681:  Maybe relocate AvePla.
PR 682:  Is BosCam correct?
PR 683:  Fine.
PR 684:  Seems fine.
PR 685:  Fine.
PR 686:  Fine.
PR 687:  Fine.
PR 688:  Fine.
PR 689:  Fine.
PR 690:  Fine.
PR 691:  Fine.
PR 692:  Fine.
PR 693:  Should AveJoseEfr be PR6696?
PR 694:  Fine.
PR 695:  Fine.
PR 696:  See PR 693.
PR 697:  Fine.
PR 698:  Fine.
PR 699:  Fine.
PR 701:  Is PR 7701 missing?
PR 702:  See PR 138.
PR 703:  Fine.
PR 704:  Fine.
PR 705:  Does this road circle around?
PR 706:  Fine.
PR 707:  Is the western end at the right location?
PR 708:  Fine.
PR 709:  Fine.
PR 710:  Fine.
PR 712:  Fine.
PR 713:  A graph connection is needed with PR 3.
PR 714:  Seems fine.
PR 715:  Fine.
« Last Edit: July 22, 2021, 09:35:57 pm by Markkos1992 »

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1929
  • Last Login:Today at 02:01:15 pm
Re: usapr: Puerto Rico Territorial Highways
« Reply #49 on: July 23, 2021, 11:08:01 am »
PR 716:  Fine.
PR 717:  Fine.
PR 718:  Fine.
PR 719:  Fine.
PR 720:  Seems fine.
PR 721:  Fine.
PR 722:  Seems fine.
PR 723:  Fine.
PR 724:  Fine.
PR 725:  Looks like at least part of PR 726 is actually PR 7725.
PR 726:  See PR 725.
PR 727:  Fine.
PR 728:  Is End at the right location?
PR 729:  Seems fine.
PR 730:  Fine.
PR 731:  Seems fine.
PR 733:  Is End at the right location?
PR 734:  Seems fine.
PR 735:  Fine.
PR 738:  Should this be split into two parts?
PR 739:  Fine.
PR 740:  Seems fine.
PR 741:  Is End at the right location?
PR 742:  Is End at the right location?  May extend to PR 743. (instead of PR 7042?)
PR 743:  Seems fine beyond what I stated for PR 742.
PR 744:  Fine.
PR 745:  Is End at the right location?
PR 746:  Is End at the right location?
PR 747:  Seems fine.
PR 748:  I think this route should maybe be split into two parts.  You cannot follow PR 748 along its PR 3 concurrency at the moment.  Also is End at the right location?
PR 749:  Fine.
PR 750:  Is End at the right location?
PR 751:  Fine.
PR 752:  Is End at the right location?
PR 753:  Is this put in correctly with PR 7754?
PR 754:  Is End at the right location?
PR 755:  I do not think that this extends to PR 3.
PR 757:  I think this whole route should be rechecked.
PR 758:  Fine.
PR 759:  Fine.
PR 760: It looks like PR 901 has a concurrency with this route.  (maybe to PR 939)  Is End at the right location?
PR 761:  Seems fine.
PR 762:  Fine.
PR 763:  Fine.
PR 764:  Is End at the right location?
PR 765:  Seems fine.
PR 768:  I think this route should be relooked at.
PR 769:  Fine.
PR 770:  I think this route should be relooked at.
PR 771:  Fine.
PR 772:  Fine.
PR 773:  Fine.
PR 774 (Comerío):  Fine.
PR 774 (Barranquitas):  Is End at the right location?
PR 775:  Fine.
PR 776:  Is End at the right location?
PR 777:  Fine.
PR 778:  It looks like this and PR 7778 may need to switch.
PR 779:  Fine.
PR 780:  Fine.
PR 781:  Fine.
PR 782:  Does this route go north of PR 156? 
PR 783:  Is End at the right location?
PR 784:  Fine.
PR 785:  Fine.
PR 786:  Is End at the right location?
PR 787:  Fine.
PR 788:  Is PR 766 missing?
PR 789:  See PR 183.
PR 790:  Fine.
PR 791:  Fine.
PR 792:  Fine. (See PR 793)
PR 793:  Seems fine if PR 7793 is correct.
PR 794:  Is End at the right location?
PR 795:  Fine.
PR 796:  Is CamCur correct?
PR 797:  Fine.
PR 798:  Consider redoing the PR1 labels.
PR 799:  Fine.
PR 800:  Is End at the right location?
PR 801:  Is End at the right location?
PR 802:  Fine.
PR 803:  Fine.
PR 804:  Fine.
PR 805:  Fine.
PR 806:  Fine.
PR 807:  Fine.
PR 808:  Fine.
PR 809:  Seems fine.
PR 810:  Fine.
PR 811:  Fine.
PR 812:  Fine.
PR 813:  Is End at the right location?
PR 814:  Is CamDonTito correct?
PR 815:  Seems fine if CamMul is in the correct location.
PR 816:  Fine.
PR 817:  Seems fine, but I do not see this route on the spreadsheet, map, or GSV.
PR 818:  Should Cor/Veg be End?
PR 819:  Fine.
PR 820:  Fine.
PR 821:  It looks like PR 159 has two intersections with this route.
PR 823:  Seems fine.
PR 824:  Seems fine.
PR 825:  Fine.
PR 826 (Lago la Plata):  Is End at the right location?
PR 826 (Naranjito):  Fine.
PR 827:  Fine.
PR 828:  Fine.
PR 829:  Is CllViaRex correct?
PR 830:  Fine.
PR 831:  AveBell should be AveBel.
PR 832:  Seems fine.
PR 833:  Is CllJuanRam correct?  Is there a PR 833R?  AveSanAna should be AveSanAna_N.
PR 834:  Fine if this route is still correct.  OSM shows it relocated onto the Expressway.
PR 835:  Does this make it to PR 834 now?
PR 836:  Fine.
PR 837:  Is CllRafHer correct?  This route should also be rechecked.
PR 838:  Fine.
PR 839:  Does this make it to PR 167 and/or PR 855 somehow?
PR 840:  Fine.
PR 841:  Fine.
PR 842:  Fine.
PR 843:  Fine.
PR 844:  Fine.
PR 845:  Fine.
PR 846:  Fine.
PR 847:  Fine.
PR 848:  See PR 887.
PR 849:  Fine.
PR 850:  Seems fine.
PR 851:  CamPCJLino should be shortened more I think.
PR 852:  PR199 should be PR181.
PR 853:  Seems fine.
PR 854:  Fine.
PR 855:  Seems fine.
PR 856:  Fine.
PR 857:  Fine.
PR 858:  Fine.
PR 859:  Fine.
PR 860:  See PR 867.  Is End at the right location?
PR 861:  Is PR 8861 missing?
PR 862:  Fine.
PR 863:  Is CllNar correct?
PR 864:  Seems fine.
PR 865:  Is PR 865R a thing?
PR 866:  Fine.
PR 867:  Fine.
PR 869:  Fine.
PR 870:  Fine. 
PR 871:  Is the northern end at the right location?
PR 872:  Fine.
PR 873:  Is CllMar correct?
PR 874:  Seems fine.
PR 876:  Seems fine.
PR 877:  Fine.
PR 878:  Fine.
PR 879:  Is this route in there correctly beyond the endpoints?
PR 880:  Is CllRob correct?
PR 882:  Fine.
PR 884:  Fine.
PR 887:  It looks like the PR 860 and PR 848 points are missing.
PR 888:  Seems fine.
PR 889:  Fine.
PR 890:  Is the southern end actually at PR 8855?
PR 891:  Fine.
PR 894:  Fine.
PR 900:  Is End at the right location? 
PR 901:  See PR 760.  Is PR 9901 missing?
PR 902:  Fine.
PR 904:  Seems fine based on the HERE Hybrid Day Maps.
PR 905:  It looks like PR 9905 needs to be checked.  Does this extend to PR 917?
PR 906:  Is SecCan correct?
PR 907:  Fine.
PR 908:  I am unsure if this and PR 909 have been handled right.
PR 909:  See PR 908.  Is PR 9907 missing?
PR 910:  Seems fine.
PR 912:  Is End at the right location?
PR 913:  Seems fine.
PR 914:  Seems fine.
PR 915:  Seems fine.
PR 916:  GSV indicates that this route may extend north of PR 183.
PR 917:  See PR 905.  Also move PR183_E to the center of the roundabout.
PR 918:  Fine.
PR 919:  Fine.
PR 920:  Is PR 9920 missing?
PR 921:  Fine.
PR 922:  Fine.
PR 923:  Fine.
PR 924:  Fine.
PR 925:  Fine.
PR 926:  Fine.
PR 927:  Is PR 9927 a thing?  PR53 should be ToPR53.
PR 928:  Does PR 9929 make it here?
PR 929:  Is PR 9926 missing? 
PR 930:  Fine.
PR 931:  Fine.
PR 932:  Fine.
PR 933:  Seems fine.
PR 934:  Fine.
PR 935:  Is CllAle correct?
PR 936:  Fine.
PR 937:  Fine.
PR 938:  Fine.
PR 939:  Is End at the right location? See PR 760 and PR 901.
PR 940:  Fine.
PR 941:  Fine.
PR 942:  Is End at the right location?
PR 943:  Fine.
PR 944:  Cll6 should be CllPar.  Is PR 9045 missing?
PR 945:  Is PR 8852 missing?
PR 946:  Is End at the right location?
PR 947:  Is End at the right location?
PR 948:  Seems fine.
PR 949:  Seems fine.
PR 950:  Is this route in there correctly beyond the endpoints?
PR 951:  Fine.
PR 952:  Fine.
PR 953:  Fine.
PR 954:  Fine.
PR 955:  Consider editing the PR 3 points.  Should the east end be put at the PR 3/PR 968 intersection?
PR 956:  Seems fine.
PR 957:  Fine.
PR 958:  Fine.
PR 959:  Seems fine?
PR 960:  Fine.
PR 961:  Is the south end at the right location?
PR 962:  Fine.
PR 963:  Is this at the right location?
PR 964:  Fine.
PR 965:  Fine.
PR 966:  Seems fine.
PR 967:  Fine.
PR 968:  Seems fine, should maybe be extended.
PR 969:  Fine.
PR 970:  Is PR 9970 missing?
PR 971:  Fine.
PR 972:  Fine.
PR 973:  Fine.
PR 974 (Ceiba):  Fine.
PR 974 (Naguabo):  Seems fine.
PR 975:  Fine.
PR 976:  I am pretty sure this does not make it to PR 195.
PR 977:  Fine.
PR 978:  Fine.
PR 979:  Fine.
PR 980:  See PR 181.  CllDrVeveCal_N should be shortened if it stays. 
PR 981:  Fine.
PR 982:  Fine.
PR 983:  It looks like the southern part of this may be PR 9983...
PR 984:  Fine.
PR 985:  Is there a PR 9985?
PR 986:  Fine.
PR 987:  Is CabSanJuan correct?  I think End is correct.
PR 988:  See PR 983. 
PR 989:  Is End at the right location?
PR 990 (Luquillo):  Fine.
PR 990 (Rio Grande):  Is there a PR 9991 here?
PR 991:  Fine.
PR 992:  PR3_W should just be PR3.
PR 994:  Fine.
PR 995:  Fine.
PR 996:  Fine.
PR 997:  Fine.
PR 1107:  Should AveJuanSan be added to this and PR 2?  The shaping point should become a visible point for ToPR107.  (may affect PR 107 as well)
PR 1111:  A point is needed for PR 1111 at this connector.  May need to be added to PR 111 as well.
« Last Edit: July 25, 2021, 04:16:01 pm by Markkos1992 »

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1929
  • Last Login:Today at 02:01:15 pm
Re: usapr: Puerto Rico Territorial Highways
« Reply #50 on: July 26, 2021, 12:28:30 pm »
PR 3101:  CamAlv shoul be CllBlas or CllSanBlas.
PR 3108:  Fine.
PR 3116:  Fine.
PR 3131:  Is End at the right location?
PR 3132:  Seems fine for now.  (may eventually extend to PR 132 on both ends)
PR 3301:  Fine.
PR 3306:  Seems fine presuming the north end is correct.
PR 3311:  Fine.
PR 3312:  Fine.
PR 3330:  This route should be entirely rechecked.  Fine based on the spreadsheet though.
PR 3332:  Fine.
PR 3334:  Fine.
PR 3336:  Should the hidden point be made visible and named ToPR335?
PR 3341:  Fine.
PR 3342:  Change PR102_S to just PR102.
PR 3344:  Should PR 103 be signed in this area? Otherwise fine.
PR 3345:  Is this actually part of PR 345?
PR 3349:  Fine.
PR 3351:  Fine.
PR 3353:  Fine if it does not follow any other route (thanks OSM..)
PR 3362:  Fine.
PR 3363:  I am unsure if this one goes to PR 2 or PR 102...
PR 3365:  Fine.
PR 3366:  Is End at the right location?
PR 3370:  Fine.
PR 3372:  Fine.
PR 3374:  Fine.
PR 3375:  May be fine (based on PR 375 and PR 377).
PR 3376:  Fine.
PR 3378:  Seems fine.
PR 3380:  Seems fine.
PR 3382:  Is End at the right location?
PR 3384:  This route should be rechecked.
PR 3391:  Seems fine.
« Last Edit: July 26, 2021, 01:49:57 pm by Markkos1992 »

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1929
  • Last Login:Today at 02:01:15 pm
Re: usapr: Puerto Rico Territorial Highways
« Reply #51 on: July 27, 2021, 06:54:09 pm »
PR 4010:  Fine.
PR 4020:  Seems fine.
PR 4076:  Seems fine.
PR 4109:  Seems fine.
PR 4110:  Fine.
PR 4111:  Fine.
PR 4116:  Fine.
PR 4119:  See PR 485.  I am also unsure that CllAmaBra_E is correct.
PR 4125:  Seems fine.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2021, 07:08:15 pm by Markkos1992 »

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1929
  • Last Login:Today at 02:01:15 pm
Re: usapr: Puerto Rico Territorial Highways
« Reply #52 on: August 01, 2021, 08:35:17 am »
PR 4401:  Is End at the right location?
PR 4402:  Is End at the right location?
PR 4403:  Wow, this one is weird, it could go to PR 495, but it does not according to the spreadsheet.
PR 4404:  Seems fine.
PR 4405:  Fine.
PR 4406:  Fine.
PR 4409:  Fine.
PR 4411:  Seems fine.
PR 4412:  Fine.
PR 4415:  Fine.
PR 4416:  Fine.
PR 4417:  I just noticed that there may be a PR 417R.
PR 4418:  Fine.
PR 4419:  Seems fine.
PR 4420:  Seems fine.
PR 4421:  Fine.
PR 4423:  Seems fine.  See PR 423.
PR 4428:  Seems fine.
PR 4430:  Fine.
PR 4431:  Should the PR431 point be there?  See PR 426.
PR 4432:  Fine.
PR 4435:  Is End at the right location?
PR 4439:  Fine.
PR 4440:  Seems fine.
PR 4441:  Is End at the right location?
PR 4442:  Seems fine.
PR 4443:  Fine.
PR 4444:  Fine.
PR 4445:  Fine based on PR 445.
PR 4446:  Is End at the right location?
PR 4451:  See PR 451.  PR 451 and PR 4451 could maybe be combined.
PR 4453:  Fine.
PR 4454:  Fine.
PR 4457:  Fine.
PR 4458:  Fine.
PR 4466:  Fine.
PR 4467:  Fine.
PR 4472:  See PR 212.  (I see a sign for PR 212 here.)  CllJuanHer_W should be AveJuanHer_W.
PR 4474:  Fine.
PR 4475:  Seems fine.
PR 4476:  See PR 446.
PR 4484:  Fine.
PR 4485:  Is End at the right location?
PR 4486:  See PR 456.
PR 4488:  Seems fine.
PR 4489:  This one needs to be rechecked. Also is there a PR 489R?
PR 4490:  Should AveOlas be BlvdOlas?
PR 4491:  Fine.
PR 4494:  See PR 212.
« Last Edit: August 01, 2021, 12:50:03 pm by Markkos1992 »

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1929
  • Last Login:Today at 02:01:15 pm
Re: usapr: Puerto Rico Territorial Highways
« Reply #53 on: August 02, 2021, 01:39:01 pm »
PR 5011:  Seems fine.
PR 5139:  Fine.
PR 5141:  Fine.
PR 5144:  Fine.
PR 5149:  Seems fine.
PR 5150:  Seems fine.
PR 5155:  Add a point at SalMor.
PR 5156:  Fine.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1929
  • Last Login:Today at 02:01:15 pm
Re: usapr: Puerto Rico Territorial Highways
« Reply #54 on: August 04, 2021, 01:51:08 pm »
PR 5506:  Fine.
PR 5507:  Should this route be split into two parts?
PR 5509:  Seems fine.
PR 5510:  Fine.
PR 5511:  Is End at the right location?
PR 5512:  Is End at the right location?
PR 5513:  I am doubtful that this actually extends to PR 149.
PR 5514:  Seems fine.
PR 5516:  Fine.
PR 5518:  Fine.
PR 5519:  Is End at the right location?
PR 5520:  Is PR 1150 a thing, and either way, is End at the right location?
PR 5521:  Fine.
PR 5523:  Fine.
PR 5525:  This route needs to be relooked at (at least the southern part).
PR 5527:  Fine.
PR 5538:  Fine.
PR 5550 (Juana Díaz):  I am not sure that this route is correct at all.  The segment rest of PR 149 does not seem to even intersect it.
PR 5550 (Villalba):  Just to confuse me more, the HERE Hybrid maps show this going to PR 149.  I do not think it is right though.   :-\
PR 5552:  See PR 551.
PR 5553:  Does this extend to what may be PR 1150?
PR 5556:  Fine.
PR 5557:  Fine.
PR 5558:  Fine.
PR 5559:  Fine.
PR 5561:  Fine.
PR 5562:  Seems fine.
PR 5567:  Is End at the right location?
PR 5568:  Fine.
« Last Edit: August 04, 2021, 03:40:25 pm by Markkos1992 »

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1929
  • Last Login:Today at 02:01:15 pm
Re: usapr: Puerto Rico Territorial Highways
« Reply #55 on: August 05, 2021, 06:58:49 am »
PR 6032:  Probably fine.  This could be part of PR 632, but I doubt it.
PR 6109:  Does this extend south of PR 651?
PR 6111:  Probably fine.  Part of me wants to question the PR 123 concurrency.
PR 6121:  Seems fine.
PR 6123:  Should AccPR10 be ToPR10?  (On PR 10, ToPR123 should be ToPR6123.)  Is End at the right location?
PR 6165:  Fine.
PR 6602:  Fine.
PR 6603:  Is End at the right location?
PR 6609:  Does this extend back to PR 10 on the north end?
PR 6612:  Fine.
PR 6613:  Fine.
PR 6614:  Seems fine.
PR 6615:  Fine.
PR 6616:  Is End at the right location?
PR 6617 (Morovis(C)):  PR159_W should just be PR159.
PR 6617 (Morovis(E)):  PR137_S should just be PR137.  PR159_E should just be PR159.
PR 6618:  Fine.
PR 6619:  Fine.
PR 6620:  Fine.
PR 6621:  Fine.
PR 6622:  Fine.
PR 6623:  Fine.  I wish I could clarify the routing in Moravia better.
PR 6626:  Fine.
PR 6632:  Fine.
PR 6633:  Fine.
PR 6634:  Fine.
PR 6642:  Fine.
PR 6645:  Fine.
PR 6659:  Fine.
PR 6671:  Probably fine.  I am not sure why this shield only shows it going north of PR 2.
PR 6677:  Is End at the right location?
PR 6678:  Fine presuming that this does not somehow make it to PR 676.
PR 6681:  Fine.
PR 6684:  Fine.
PR 6685:  Fine.
PR 6686:  Fine.
PR 6690:  Fine.
PR 6693:  Fine.
PR 7025:  Only one point is currently shown for this route.
PR 7042:  See PR 742.
PR 7051:  Is End at the right location?
PR 7062:  Is End at the right location?
PR 7090:  Should this be part of PR 782?  (See PR 782)  A graph connection is missing at PR 7790.
PR 7156:  Fine.
PR 7173:  Is End at the right location?
PR 7707:  Fine.
PR 7709:  Is End at the right location?
PR 7710:  Is End at the right location?
PR 7712:  Fine.
PR 7715:  Does this extend to PR 1?
PR 7718:  Fine.
PR 7719:  Fine.
PR 7720:  Seems fine.
PR 7722:  Fine.
PR 7727:  Is End at the right location?
PR 7728:  Is End at the right location?
PR 7729:  Seems fine.
PR 7730:  Does this road extend farther north?
PR 7731:  Fine.
PR 7733:  Fine.
PR 7736:  Fine.
PR 7737:  Fine.
PR 7738:  Is End at the right location?
PR 7740:  Seems fine.
PR 7741:  Fine.
PR 7748:  Is End at the right location?
PR 7752:  Fine.
PR 7753:  Is End at the right location?
PR 7754:  See PR 753.
PR 7755:  Fine.
PR 7756:  See PR 757.  Otherwise fine.
PR 7757:  Fine.
PR 7758:  Fine.
PR 7759:  Is End at the right location?
PR 7760:  Fine.
PR 7761:  Is End at the right location?
PR 7762:  Is End at the right location?
PR 7765:  Fine.
PR 7769:  Is End at the right location?
PR 7772:  Fine.
PR 7773:  Is End at the right location?
PR 7774:  Fine.
PR 7775:  Fine.
PR 7776:  Is the north end at the right location?
PR 7778:  See PR 778.
PR 7780:  Does this extend to PR 167?
PR 7782:  Fine.
PR 7783:  Is this route put in correctly?
PR 7784:  GSV shows this route going in the other direction from PR 172...
PR 7786:  Should maybe be extended?
PR 7787:  Is End at the right location?
PR 7788:  Seems fine.
PR 7790:  See PR 7090.
PR 7793:  See PR 793.
PR 8176:  Fine.
PR 8177:  Fine.
PR 8809:  Seems fine.
PR 8811:  A slight recentering of the PR164 point may be useful. 
PR 8825:  CllAme should be CllHacLum.
PR 8826:  Is End at the right location?
PR 8829:  Fine.
PR 8834:  Fine though the PR834 label would need to be fixed if PR 834 is rerouted.
PR 8838:  Seems fine, but why is there a PR 8839 mentioned in the spreadsheet?
PR 8852:  Fine.
PR 8855:  Fine.
PR 8856:  Fine.
PR 8860:  Fine.
PR 8865:  Fine.
PR 8869:  Fine.
PR 8874:  The shaping points should be replaced with visible points.
PR 8887:  Fine.
PR 9030:  Fine.
PR 9045:  Does this extend to PR 8852 or PR 853?
PR 9185:  Fine.
PR 9188:  Is this route missing?
PR 9902:  Is End at the right location?
PR 9904:  See PR 905.
PR 9905:  OSM and HERE Hybrid Maps show a PR 9903 potentially connecting to this somewhere.
PR 9909:  Fine.
PR 9910:  Fine.
PR 9911:  Fine.
PR 9912:  Fine.
PR 9913:  Fine.
PR 9914:  Fine.
PR 9918:  PR918 should be PR182.
PR 9919:  Probably fine.
PR 9920:  Does this extend to PR 920?  PR182 should be PR181.
PR 9921:  Probably fine.
PR 9922:  PR189 should be PR183.
PR 9923:  Is End at the right location?
PR 9929:  Probably fine, based on the status of PR 9926.
PR 9931:  Fine.
PR 9933:  Fine.
PR 9934:  Fine, but is there a PR 189R to account for here?
PR 9935:  Fine.
PR 9936:  Fine.
PR 9937:  Seems fine.
PR 9938:  Fine.
PR 9939:  See PR 198.
PR 9942:  Fine.
PR 9944:  Fine.
PR 9945:  Seems fine.
PR 9948:  Is End at the right location?
PR 9957:  Fine.
PR 9959:  Probably fine.  I am not sure why OSM shows it going on another loop back to PR 3.  (Maybe the spreadsheet indicates such...)
PR 9960:  Is PR 963 related to this somehow?  This may loop back to PR 186.
PR 9966:  Fine.  I believe that this PR 966 posting is an error.
PR 9973:  Fine.
PR 9974:  Probably fine based on seeing no issues with PR 973 and PR 974.
PR 9983:  Fine.
PR 9984:  Does this extend to PR 9988?
PR 9987:  Fine.
PR 9988:  See PR 9984.  Otherwise fine.
PR 9989:  Does this connect back to PR 9988?
PR 9990:  Fine.
PR 9991:  Does this connect to PR 990 (Rio Grande)?  Otherwise fine.
« Last Edit: August 09, 2021, 02:55:57 pm by Markkos1992 »

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1929
  • Last Login:Today at 02:01:15 pm
Re: usapr: Puerto Rico Territorial Highways
« Reply #56 on: August 09, 2021, 02:56:26 pm »
My peer review of Puerto Rico has been completed.

Offline mapcat

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1241
  • Last Login:Today at 11:10:54 am
Re: usapr: Puerto Rico Territorial Highways
« Reply #57 on: August 09, 2021, 06:23:46 pm »
Thank you! I will sort through your comments and respond later this month.
Clinched:

Offline mapcat

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1241
  • Last Login:Today at 11:10:54 am
Re: usapr: Puerto Rico Territorial Highways
« Reply #58 on: September 04, 2021, 09:40:02 pm »
As I get started on my response to the review, I have two general questions.
  • What is the difference between "fine", "seems fine", and "probably fine"?
  • "Is End at the right location?" comes up a lot. It would be helpful to know what makes you doubt the location I used.
I still can't find my copy of the DTOP map and have reached out to compdude787 to see if he still has the one I sent.
Clinched:

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1929
  • Last Login:Today at 02:01:15 pm
Re: usapr: Puerto Rico Territorial Highways
« Reply #59 on: September 05, 2021, 07:07:50 am »
Quote
What is the difference between "fine", "seems fine", and "probably fine"?

Nothing really beyond 100% confidence on my end.  For these, I recommend not making any changes.

Quote
"Is End at the right location?" comes up a lot. It would be helpful to know what makes you doubt the location I used.

Mainly general doubt from what I see on OSM/HERE Maps versus your location.

Personally, for this review, I am on the side of "you do what you do" instead of being particular and specific about the changes as I normally am simply because there will not likely ever be 100% certainty with Puerto Rico unless one day someone from there joins the forum.