Author Topic: jpntk: Japan Toshi Kōsokudōro  (Read 1534 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline si404

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1536
  • Last Login:September 18, 2021, 04:23:03 pm
Re: jpntk: Japan Toshi Kōsokudōro
« Reply #15 on: July 26, 2021, 06:20:04 am »
FE2
a) Rename waypoint 207 to FEC.
b) Add waypoint 207 at a point intermediate between where the 207 entrance and exit reach N3 beneath the expressway. 
    207 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=33.564254&lon=130.465316

b) Rename waypoint 501 to FE2.
c) Add exit 501.  The connection to surface roads is within the junction.
    501 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=33.564398&lon=130.462122 
    Or you could use where the connection to FEC occurs:
    501 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=33.560868&lon=130.459391
This is very much a one-point-per-interchange situation.

Offline nezinscot

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 63
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 05:14:13 pm
Re: jpntk: Japan Toshi Kōsokudōro
« Reply #16 on: July 29, 2021, 12:19:46 pm »
OK, I'll use that rule for the rest of these situations.  Should the waypoint name be based on the exit or the junction?  In most if not all cases, the junction is the more important movement.

Offline nezinscot

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 63
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 05:14:13 pm
Re: jpntk: Japan Toshi Kōsokudōro
« Reply #17 on: August 25, 2021, 03:51:32 pm »
Hanshin Expressways - second review

HE1
a) Exit 1-11 does not connect with HE1. It connects with HE15.  Maybe move HE15_E to this location.

HE4
a) The positioning waypoints are probably not needed.

HE5
a) The positioning waypoints are probably not needed.

HE7
a) P16/65 is exit 7-05.
    https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6953916,135.0786998,3a,79.4y,109.67h,98.32t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sPoYwJBD0CorccRz_5IyRFw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
    https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6967509,135.0742757,3a,75y,163.47h,91.29t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1su9nEvIp1_6CDhCNeYK-Tlg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

HE16
a) The positioning waypoints are probably not needed.

Offline nezinscot

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 63
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 05:14:13 pm
Re: jpntk: Japan Toshi Kōsokudōro
« Reply #18 on: September 13, 2021, 11:58:59 am »
Nagoya Expressways - second review

NEC1
a) No changes

NE1
a) Entrances 101 and 114 begin very near the start and end junctions respectively.  101 is used for the name of the NEC1 junction, but 114 is not used for the name of the C2 junction.
    101 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.179099&lon=136.913965
    114 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.228188&lon=136.909991 
b) Waypoint C2 could be named C2/NE11 if not named 114.

NE2
a) Move waypoint 201 to where 201/211 meet the surface road.
    201 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.162348&lon=136.896966
b) Move waypoint 205 to where the exit meets the surface road. 
    205 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.159819&lon=136.958646
c) Add waypoint 215.  It is 0.3 mi from 205.
    215 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.158414&lon=136.963439

NE3
a) The exits in most of the exit pairs on NE3 are far enough apart that I think that each should be listed separately.  Exit 314 isn’t visible on OSM but is present in GSV.  Also, waypoint 315 needs to be adjusted.
    NEC1 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.150350&lon=136.916996
    311 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.143593&lon=136.917914
    301 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.138694&lon=136.918415
    312 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.127791&lon=136.919925
    302 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.122083&lon=136.920859
    313 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.112390&lon=136.922390
    303 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.107773&lon=136.923128
    314 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.098554&lon=136.927002
    304 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.088756&lon=136.932237
    315 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.080624&lon=136.926682

NE4
a) Replace current waypoint 401 with separate points for each direction of travel. 
    401 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.150199&lon=136.892779
    411 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.145000&lon=136.893056
b) Exits 402/412 are only 0.11 mi apart, so you could either have separate points
        412 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.126815&lon=136.889842
        402 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.125373&lon=136.889088
    or alternatively use only one point for them
        402 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.126121&lon=136.889509
c) Add waypoint 413
    413 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.118612&lon=136.887143
d) Add waypoint 417
    417 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.056686&lon=136.898924

NE5
a) Waypoint NE2/C1 could be named NE2/NEC1.
b) Current waypoint 502 is actually for exit 512.  Consider adding a separate point for 502.
    502 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.157528&lon=136.863642
    512 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.157626&lon=136.859136

NE6
a) Current waypoint 601 should be named NEC1.  Exits 601/611 are just slightly north of the junction but are not part of the junction.
b) Add waypoint 601 at a point between where 601 and 611 meet the surface road. 
    601 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.178624&lon=136.889917

NE11
a) Waypoint C2 could be named C2/NE1.
b) Replace waypoints 1101 and 1103 with
    1101 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.239902&lon=136.909074
    1111 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.243496&lon=136.908672
    1103 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.257412&lon=136.907536
    1113 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.262438&lon=136.907973
b) Add waypoint 1115 
    1115 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.284253&lon=136.906187

NE16
a) Waypoint C2 could be named C2/NE6.