Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: Duke87 on June 19, 2017, 10:33:06 pm

Title: TX: New bypass of Andrews
Post by: Duke87 on June 19, 2017, 10:33:06 pm

Andrews, TX (http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/32.3238/-102.5514) has a new ring road, Loop 1910. While the loop itself appears to be county maintained and does not need to be mapped (it is signed like this (http://i.imgur.com/4yJ8poo.jpg)), this IMO warrants the addition of points for it on the routes that intersect it (US 385, TX 115, and TX 176).

Title: Re: TX: New bypass of Andrews
Post by: yakra on June 20, 2017, 03:09:41 am

Quote from: Duke87 on June 19, 2017, 10:33:06 pm

Andrews, TX (http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/32.3238/-102.5514) has a new ring road, Loop 1910. While the loop itself appears to be county maintained and does not need to be mapped (it is signed like this (http://i.imgur.com/4yJ8poo.jpg)), this IMO warrants the addition of points for it on the routes that intersect it (US 385, TX 115, and TX 176).

I saw your post in Texas Highways, was thinking along these same lines, and looked into it. Wiki[citation needed]pedia says it's city maintained; tomato tomato. :) I was thinking "Lp1910" (sans the "TX" used in actual TXLps) style labels may be the ticket.

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/1390