Travel Mapping
Highway Data Discussion => In-progress Highway Systems & Work => Completed Highway Systems Threads => Topic started by: si404 on June 08, 2016, 06:22:29 am
-
This system is ready for review.
-
Why G1 to G112 only? Is there any reason why G201+ is not included?
-
Above 199 are Regionalna Ceste.
-
Ok but what's your source?
If you're right, they should be a potential tier 5 system.
-
There is potential for a level 5 system. Whether it would just be the first class regional roads (R2xx) or all three classes I don't know.
Here's a source
http://www.di.gov.si/fileadmin/di.gov.si/pageuploads/Ceste_250_DRSC_2013_pregledna_karta_manjsa.jpg
-
Here's a source
http://www.di.gov.si/fileadmin/di.gov.si/pageuploads/Ceste_250_DRSC_2013_pregledna_karta_manjsa.jpg
Thanks :). If I get the legend right, 1-99 are First Class Roads, 100-199 Second Class Roads, 200-299 Regional First Class Roads et cetera.
Why is it handled different to Bulgaria (bgri vs. bgrii)? If it would, it should be like:
violet = snva (tier 1)
red = snvh (tier 2)
orange = snvgi (tier 4)
yellow = snvgii (tier 5)
I think Austria and Switzerland are similar.
-
When I've made the second class Bulgarian roads, I'll probably merge the two systems - other than the number of digits (ditto Slovenia) there's no difference between how the road's number is signed or who maintains it.
-
Any further comments?
-
G7:
G404 should be R404
G409 should be R409
G630 should be R630
G11:
4 shaping points between CesMarUpo and Sma, 2 per curve?
G102:
Curves with 2 shaping points b/n IdrLog and R207; Looks odd that the southern segment has many shaping points but the northern segment b/c the northern segment which is also curve has no additional shaping point
G104:
G104Men wp should be labeled G104; SELF_REF FP
G105:
Curves with 2 shaping points b/n VinVas and R421
G106:
G106Sma wp should be labeled G106; SELF_REF FP
G107:
G234 should be R234
G109:
Are the R443 wps really required? I've usually excluded wps like this. It's just a simple interchange with A5.
G111:
Additional wp?
PodCes http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.507039&lon=13.602115 or
Oba http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.503550&lon=13.606074
There is potential for a level 5 system. Whether it would just be the first class regional roads (R2xx) or all three classes I don't know.
G1 to G112 are main routes and R201 to R937 are regional routes. G with class 1 and 2, R with class 1, 2 and 3. All have R prefix and I see no reason why R201 to R937 should only be partially tier 5.
-
I've checked G104 on GSV and couldn't find any sign with '104' there. It's signed on GM and OSM though and it's indicated on the official map from http://di.gov.si.
Must the route be removed from HB now? I haven't checked the other routes...
-
It seems these roads are only signed (but are signed) on km posts. I'm going to include them anyway.
-
G104:
G104Men wp should be labeled G104; SELF_REF FP
G106:
G106Sma wp should be labeled G106; SELF_REF FP
No. The manual says:
"Distinguish two different same-bannered same-numbered routes as needed with the 3-letter city abbreviations. Also use the city abbreviation for bannerless same-designation spurs or branches, such as the Zurich A3 spur intersecting the main A3."
Anyway, other than those two, these changes are in. Anymore, or is this system good to go?
-
No objections. I think you can finally activate it.
-
G104:
G104Men wp should be labeled G104; SELF_REF FP
G106:
G106Sma wp should be labeled G106; SELF_REF FP
No. The manual says:
"Distinguish two different same-bannered same-numbered routes as needed with the 3-letter city abbreviations. Also use the city abbreviation for bannerless same-designation spurs or branches, such as the Zurich A3 spur intersecting the main A3."
Ok, if A111Abc connects A111 and A222, A111 wp should be called "A111Abc".
But should the A222 wp be called "A111" or "A111Abc"?
Anyway, other than those two, these changes are in. Anymore, or is this system good to go?
Sorry, I thought you always check it but there are still some pending data check errors (http://tm.teresco.org/devel/datacheck.php#active) which are "active" now.