Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: yakra on September 19, 2019, 03:49:19 pm

Title: SD items
Post by: yakra on September 19, 2019, 03:49:19 pm

I-90BLCha: SD50 is signed to turn north on Courtland (https://www.google.com/maps/@43.8096192,-99.331895,3a,19.7y,308.52h,87.37t/data=!3m10!1e1!3m8!1s8-HyJypRL8FwEtHAZ2CkEg!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3D8-HyJypRL8FwEtHAZ2CkEg%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D332.3504%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656!9m2!1b1!2i40), rather than use a Main/Courtland couplet.
I-90 & SD50 also need a shaping point between exits 265 & 272 (http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.752486&lon=-99.258369).
I-90BLPre: OldUS16_W -> SD248_W; OldUS16_E -> SD248_E
US16: recommend replacing +X05 with a visible point at Moon Meadows Dr
I-90BLRap: OldSD79_S -> StJosSt_E, EStJosSt, or probably more simply, just EastBlvd, for a present-day visible name.
SD244: MtRush -> MtRusNP

Title: Re: SD items
Post by: the_spui_ninja on September 21, 2019, 04:49:25 am

Quote from: yakra on September 19, 2019, 03:49:19 pm

I-90BLRap: OldSD79_S -> StJosSt_E, EStJosSt, or probably more simply, just EastBlvd, for a present-day visible name.

Would that be EastBlvd_S, since the BL leaves East again just a bit to the north (current point EBlvd, which would then have to be changed to EastBlvd_N)?

Title: Re: SD items
Post by: yakra on September 21, 2019, 03:29:32 pm

EastBlvd_S  EastBlvd_N, yes thanks. The north one looks like it could use its coords tweaked too.

Title: Re: SD items
Post by: Highway63 on September 29, 2019, 11:41:07 am

SD 50 goes north on Main, but south on Chamberlain, because Main is one-way NB. No change.
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.8148093,-99.3277153,3a,75y,245h,78.15t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s4EzgaSBukdsgBbwWZA7LOw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

But the other things, including the East Boulevard and point tweak, I'm getting in.