Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: Markkos1992 on December 26, 2019, 09:33:29 pm

Title: NY: US 219 I-90 Points
Post by: Markkos1992 on December 26, 2019, 09:33:29 pm
I-90_S and I-90_N should probably be edited at minimum to I-90_W and I-90_E.
Title: Re: NY: US 219 I-90 Points
Post by: neroute2 on December 26, 2019, 10:56:42 pm
If there's no overlap, you use directions of 219. No change is required.
Title: Re: NY: US 219 I-90 Points
Post by: yakra on December 28, 2019, 03:20:37 pm
The dual carriageway setup is a bit borderline Alanlandian, but I'm with neroute2. Marking solved.
Title: Re: NY: US 219 I-90 Points
Post by: Markkos1992 on December 28, 2019, 04:57:57 pm
Rethinking it, I was leaning towards suggesting using the Thruway exit numbers for those points as weird as it may look.  It could be considered complicated since they are NYST numbers instead of I-90 numbers.
Title: Re: NY: US 219 I-90 Points
Post by: si404 on December 28, 2019, 05:31:04 pm
It could be considered complicated since they are NYST numbers instead of I-90 numbers.
And also that they are both 55 (though the southern/western one is 55A in the I-90 file).

I-90(55A) and I-90(55) would work, as would NYST(55A) and NYST(55).
Title: Re: NY: US 219 I-90 Points
Post by: cl94 on December 28, 2019, 10:15:41 pm
As defined by NYSDOT, there is no overlap between I-90 and US 219. US 219 runs along the outer roadway until said roadway merges into the main Thruway lanes. It's not a concurrency and the interchange with Ridge Road is with US 219. Thruway Exit 55 is really a pair of partial exits with US 219. The way TM currently shows this is close to accurate.
Title: Re: NY: US 219 I-90 Points
Post by: Jim on December 28, 2019, 10:25:35 pm
It could be considered complicated since they are NYST numbers instead of I-90 numbers.
And also that they are both 55 (though the southern/western one is 55A in the I-90 file).

I-90(55A) and I-90(55) would work, as would NYST(55A) and NYST(55).

Given the fact that there is no concurrency, these labels make the most sense to me.  Two I-90 exits where you can get on/off US 219, correct?  And avoid the N/S vs. E/W confusion.
Title: Re: NY: US 219 I-90 Points
Post by: yakra on December 29, 2019, 11:41:05 am
I had been a bit hesitant to use a fudged Two separate interchanges numbered... (http://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/wayptlabels.php#nextsuffix) suffix in cases like these (disambiguation or multiplexes)...
(Compare ME26 (http://travelmapping.net/hb/?r=me.me026&lat=43.677199&lon=-70.256903&zoom=15) multiplexing I-295 between Exit 8 and... also Exit 8.)

But another read thru the manual suggests that exit numbers are the right way to go, suffixes notwithstanding:
Quote from: http://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/wayptlabels.php#parens
If an exit numbered highway is a cross road twice, exit numbers in parentheses can be used to distinguish them. Avoid using two designations and a parenthetical suffix in the same label.
Quote from: http://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/wayptlabels.php#underscore
If a non-exit-numbered highway is a cross road twice, add an underscored suffix. The direction letter refers to the relative position of the intersection along the route whose file is being made. US90_S is the southern of the two US 90 junctions along US 25, which runs S-N.