Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: Markkos1992 on November 20, 2020, 08:34:28 pm

Title: NC: US 29 and US 220 Point Concerns
Post by: Markkos1992 on November 20, 2020, 08:34:28 pm

US 29: 
1.    US70/601_W should just be US70/601.
2.    US70/220_E should just be US70/220.
3.    LeeSt needs to be changed to GateCityBlvd.
4.      I do not mind moving forward with adding the US 29 exit numbers for what will eventually be I-785; however, I will note that the US 29 BUS/US 58 interchange is Exit 169 (https://www.google.com/maps/@36.5355409,-79.4686981,3a,75y,6.24h,101.98t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sjK-eeB2K-zx8qTXGO1yH4g!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) on US 29 NB (presumably because you are still in NC at that point)

US 220:
1.   LeeSt needs to be changed to GateCityBlvd.
2.   WenAve should be WenAve_W.
3.   Points should arguably be added at Benjamin Pkwy (BenPkwy) (https://www.google.com/maps/@36.107957,-79.8278021,3a,75y,332.48h,90.05t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sdYqyckNPMdVqdpWfJgTX-Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) and Westridge Rd (WesRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@36.1206513,-79.842745,3a,75y,320.13h,85.86t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sefvjVP4_OtPO5W17WIzeYg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) due to connecting to Bryan Blvd.  Also Lawndale Dr (LawDr) (https://www.google.com/maps/@36.0946984,-79.8157769,3a,75y,345.81h,87.24t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1siJY4QVY2VPM2AFPS2N8_pQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DiJY4QVY2VPM2AFPS2N8_pQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D146.24767%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656) due to the connection to I-840.
4.   Is the shaping point just north of I-840 necessary? It could just be moved to Old Battleground Rd (OldBatRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@36.1461846,-79.8687904,3a,75y,354.65h,90.69t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s7wRtBbi9kj2nfWg6YJ5U8w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

Title: Re: NC: US 29 and US 220 Point Concerns
Post by: mapmikey on December 18, 2020, 08:17:23 pm

changes made and in the queue

Title: Re: NC: US 29 and US 220 Point Concerns
Post by: Markkos1992 on December 20, 2020, 10:21:37 am

One other minor error I noticed on US 29 is that ReeCrkPkwy should be ReeForkPkwy (Reedy Fork Pkwy) (https://www.google.com/maps/@36.1706439,-79.7151155,3a,75y,76.26h,89t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sV8i-Qycq47pGGKkoFh043w!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).

Title: Re: NC: US 29 and US 220 Point Concerns
Post by: mapmikey on February 05, 2021, 03:40:46 pm

fixed

Title: Re: NC: US 29 and US 220 Point Concerns
Post by: Markkos1992 on February 15, 2021, 11:01:23 am

While the US 158 labels should have been updated to match the US 29 exit numbers, it looks like I-785FutRei should stay as-is based on what we did with I-74FutPil.

Title: Re: NC: US 29 and US 220 Point Concerns
Post by: mapmikey on February 27, 2021, 04:46:48 pm

adjusted the US 158 labels with US 29 exit numbers