Travel Mapping
Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: rickmastfan67 on December 30, 2020, 02:15:51 am
-
US-15:
US15Bus_S --- offset a good distance from the intersection. Needs to be recentered. Also affect US401, US15BusLau, & US401BusLau. Could also be renamed as well in both US-15 & US-401's files to US15/401Bus.
NC144 --- this needs to be recentered, as they build a brand new roundabout to the north of the original intersection. This will also effect US501 & NC144.
US-401:
US401BusLau -> US401BusLau_N --- Also needs to be recentered too. Would affect US401BusLau as well.
-
fixed and in the queue
-
It looks like the US 15 label is now just "US" instead of US15/401Bus.
-
It looks like the US 15 label is now just "US" instead of US15/401Bus.
Plus I don't think the point is in the correct place. IMO, it should be at the traffic light.
-
Actually the issue is that the line ended up being "US +15/401Bus +US15Bus_S". So "15/401Bus" is now a hidden alternate label under "US".
-
Actually the issue is that the line ended up being "US +15/401Bus +US15Bus_S". So "15/401Bus" is now a hidden alternate label under "US".
I know. That's why I said 'plus'.
-
fixed the error
-
I want to note here that the use of US15/401Bus created a self-reference error for US 15. I presume that we will just consider it a FP, but I did want to note that.
EDIT (3-2-2021): https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/4592 (added FP)
-
I want to note here that the use of US15/401Bus created a self-reference error for US 15. I presume that we will just consider it a FP, but I did want to note that.
Overall, LABEL_SELFREF needs some attention (https://github.com/TravelMapping/DataProcessing/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3ALABEL_SELFREF)...
What we have here is (US15/401)(Bus) rather than (US15)/(401Bus).
There are a lot of these cases in HighwayData; it makes sense to continue to allow them, and not force a bunch of conversions to US15Bus/401Bus.
Perhaps in the future, these could be detected and not flagged, and we won't have to worry about marking the FPs.
https://github.com/TravelMapping/DataProcessing/issues/420
As an aside, I dislike the ambiguity in US15/401Bus style on the one hand and the lack of brevity in US15Bus/401Bus on the other (still think they should be allowed though), and resolve these cases by just going with US15Bus.