Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: Markkos1992 on March 23, 2021, 06:39:34 pm

Title: NC: NC 150 Further Point Concerns
Post by: Markkos1992 on March 23, 2021, 06:39:34 pm

1.    HavParkLn should be replaced with Olivers Crossing Dr (OliCroDr) (https://www.google.com/maps/@36.00346,-80.2626213,3a,75y,218.5h,83.44t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s02FM_LZQje15dMuZ3t5HwQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192), which does have a traffic signal with NC 150.  This way the fact that HavParkLn is in-use is a minimal issue.
2.   Adding Central Rd (CenRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.9808397,-80.2848314,3a,75y,211.01h,83.51t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sy41zCf9KpbytY4uZINx3iQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) drastically improves the shaping, and is somewhat useful due to Hartman Rd connecting to Hickory Tree Rd connecting to I-285/US 52/NC 8.
3.   SimRd is one intersection too far north.
4.   The shaping point northeast of NC 152 should be replaced by a visible point at Centenary Church Rd (CenChuRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.6177311,-80.7423309,3a,75y,350.99h,87.97t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sJzDUCKrzcceq_aoHHt6cEg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DJzDUCKrzcceq_aoHHt6cEg%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D175.51195%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656).
5.   I think that NC152Trk_W should just be McLAve (McLelland Ave) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.5880991,-80.8280092,3a,75y,308.5h,88.87t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s-fZyrcazuFEy_QIvLztcIg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).  We have precedent for this on the north end of PA 523 (https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?units=miles&u=markkos1992&r=pa.pa523) with PA 281 (https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?units=miles&u=markkos1992&r=pa.pa281&lat=39.775441&lon=-79.333051&zoom=13).
6.   I would personally like to have a point added at Williamson Rd (WilRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.5950365,-80.868716,3a,75y,278.3h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1snH4xrI99iFJOxC2F2ws8XQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) west of I-77.  This is from stopping on a mission trip to Atlanta in 2011 to eat at the nearby Bojangles.  A point at Perth Rd (PerRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.6019081,-80.8971854,3a,75y,130.09h,88.72t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sDsh213-EDW6-uaN2wY1vdA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) may also be worthwhile to help out with the shaping a little.
7.   I think that the shaping points between NC 27 and NC 16 should be replaced with visible points at Lee Lawing Rd (LeeLawRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.5408131,-81.1171179,3a,37.5y,242.01h,89.05t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sV7h28m5dcI5CucHFIrLfeg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192), King Wilkinson Rd (KingWilRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.521856,-81.1397718,3a,75y,73.37h,95.43t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s9C-6oNAcfvdyWr2dv0s0hA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192), and Curve View Rd (CurViewRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.4989457,-81.1895695,3a,75y,253.62h,88.24t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s-2QLr3jBxdGZTJVADgSC4g!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
8.   NC27Trk should be NC27Trk_W.
9.   I wonder if points should be added on the Crouse Bypass to prevent confusion with OSM.
10.   The first shaping point west of NC 274 should be replaced with a visible point at Paul H Beam Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.3716758,-81.4076757,3a,15y,234.11h,91.54t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sZW4jXrrp7XHdXloyHWjzAQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
11.   The second shaping point west of NC 274 should be replaced with a visible point at SpeDr (Sperlings Dr) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.3590618,-81.4354899,3a,15y,82.09h,91.97t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sO3iPOumoWjm2jqtZdoYN1Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
12.   Note that OSM shows a relocation of NC 180 as a part of the Shelby Bypass currently under construction.
13.   ColAve should be ColAve_W.
14.   HumFarmRd should be replaced by RivRd (Riverside Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.2032198,-81.6651275,3a,15y,47.04h,94.42t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sfZKAvQcfQC2-G1OUPRc8tA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
15.   A numerous number of alternate labels along the US 421 concurrency can be removed for not currently being in-use. (make sure to keep any highlighted in red)  IvyLn can also be removed for not being in-use.

Title: Re: NC: NC 150 Further Point Concerns
Post by: mapmikey on August 20, 2021, 11:05:37 am

changes made

Title: Re: NC: NC 150 Further Point Concerns
Post by: Markkos1992 on August 31, 2021, 11:05:20 am

Quote

8.   NC27Trk should be NC27Trk_W.

This change was not done.  Otherwise, the rest are good.

Title: Re: NC: NC 150 Further Point Concerns
Post by: mapmikey on September 17, 2021, 05:04:33 pm

fixed