Travel Mapping
Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: Markkos1992 on August 24, 2021, 02:09:18 pm
-
NJ 31:
1. The SLDs indicate that StaGraRd should be OldCliRd (Old Clinton Rd) (https://njsld.org/NJDOT/SLD/SheetViewer/00000031__/26/4).
2. Should the I-78 point be relocated farther to the west? (also affects US 22)
3. I think that MacKenRd should just be MacRd.
4. RivRd should be MusRivRd (https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7103356,-74.9662308,3a,75y,286.7h,85.24t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1suaNehK3Ij1ZFpHxamjOhSA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DuaNehK3Ij1ZFpHxamjOhSA%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D217.65529%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192).
NJ 33:
1. Is a graph connection at I-295 worth it?
2. Should CR539/571 be relocated to this intersection (https://www.google.com/maps/@40.2682439,-74.5252195,3a,75y,309.11h,90.8t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sPCSsp9D4Vgfv7LRbWVcY3w!2e0!7i16384!8i8192)?
NJ 71: 6thAve should be BriAve (Brinley Ave) (https://www.google.com/maps/@40.20291,-74.0180104,3a,75y,2.3h,84.76t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1smY3yose3YfVK7NhVJDJH7A!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DmY3yose3YfVK7NhVJDJH7A%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D317.7089%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192).
-
NJ 31:
1. The SLDs indicate that StaGraRd should be OldCliRd (Old Clinton Rd) (https://njsld.org/NJDOT/SLD/SheetViewer/00000031__/26/4).
2. Should the I-78 point be relocated farther to the west? (also affects US 22)
3. I think that MacKenRd should just be MacRd.
4. RivRd should be MusRivRd (https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7103356,-74.9662308,3a,75y,286.7h,85.24t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1suaNehK3Ij1ZFpHxamjOhSA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DuaNehK3Ij1ZFpHxamjOhSA%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D217.65529%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192).
1. Deleted.
2. There's wiggle room IMO. Keeping as-is, NJ31's route trace S of I-78 stays more accurate.
3. Changed. This gave me indigestion when doing the Maritimes (Bob & Doug say hi). Realized a while back that MacRd would be the way to go for these, and then if there's more than one to disambiguate, invoke the choose 3 different letters (https://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/wayptlabels.php#differentnames) rule.
The Maritimes could use a look-over.
4. Changed.
NJ 33:
1. Is a graph connection at I-295 worth it?
2. Should CR539/571 be relocated to this intersection (https://www.google.com/maps/@40.2682439,-74.5252195,3a,75y,309.11h,90.8t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sPCSsp9D4Vgfv7LRbWVcY3w!2e0!7i16384!8i8192)?
1. Nah.
2. Oh boy. Shapefiles & SLDs (https://njsld.org/NJDOT/SLD/SheetViewer/00000539__/50/4) confirm CR539 on Main St, with Ward St being a regular intersection. Makes sense for the NB route. SB has to use Ward to get around the one-way section of Main. There's a precedent for handling something like this in MB Rte42 (https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?r=mb.rt042&lat=49.911813239832185&lon=-97.11398005485536&zoom=16). It involves moving the route-labeled point as you suggest, and keeping the entering one-way road with a street name. Just like with VT23 (https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?r=vt.vt023&lat=44.011876&lon=-73.170206&zoom=17)/30 (https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?r=vt.vt030&lat=44.011876&lon=-73.170206&zoom=17)/125 (https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?r=vt.vt125&lat=44.011876&lon=-73.170206&zoom=17). Done.
NJ 71: 6thAve should be BriAve (Brinley Ave) (https://www.google.com/maps/@40.20291,-74.0180104,3a,75y,2.3h,84.76t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1smY3yose3YfVK7NhVJDJH7A!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DmY3yose3YfVK7NhVJDJH7A%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D317.7089%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192).
Changed.
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/5067