Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: Markkos1992 on December 02, 2021, 12:54:59 pm

Title: AZ: I-10 and AZ 85 Corridor Point Concerns
Post by: Markkos1992 on December 02, 2021, 12:54:59 pm

I-10:
1.   A point should be added for Exit 130 (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.4580567,-112.3147098,3a,75y,304.04h,93.46t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sZa1Wnzeb-wpZICh9ZtHWPQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
2.   Apparently 229 (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.5493807,-111.3026835,3a,75y,7.87h,83.31t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s0_FpvuDVX8fwJwX1Q6x9oQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) is an unnumbered exit…
3.   240 and 254 could use a slight relocation.
4.   I-10 BL (Bowie) should be synced at 366.

AZ 85: 
1.   I-8BL_E should be slightly relocated.
2.   Should a point be added here (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.9536639,-112.6868221,3a,75y,115.45h,98.56t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sMzqs7kQckGCLoxBskfiKOA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) for “TO AZ 238”?
3.   PatRd>-138 (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.1902668,-112.6515817,3a,75y,41.63h,88.99t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sCzGlqfTbJRwerZ3eBI30gg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).

US 191:  Why is CalCT labeled the way it is?

Title: Re: AZ: I-10 and AZ 85 Corridor Point Concerns
Post by: Duke87 on December 02, 2021, 09:42:49 pm

Addressed all of the above.

"CalCT" for "Calle Connecticut"... heh, yeah that's nonstandard but probably straggling from the original usaus drafting.

Title: Re: AZ: I-10 and AZ 85 Corridor Point Concerns
Post by: Markkos1992 on December 03, 2021, 08:24:58 am

I guess you had some sort of insomnia last night and decided to get through the easy stuff.

Anyway I plan to handle the rest of AZ in two posts (one for Phoenix freeways and I-17 and one for the rest, I will not do AZ 303 since that was covered before my trip).