Travel Mapping
Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: Markkos1992 on April 05, 2022, 07:45:02 pm
-
Is this sign (https://www.google.com/maps/@30.4624239,-83.4098866,3a,15y,213.93h,89.46t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s6yQVbA8M0HV1EQ2w80o2Eg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) enough to add this route? It follows FL 53 down to Harvey Greene Dr back to FL 14. The other signs just say "TRUCK ROUTE" (https://www.google.com/maps/@30.4535278,-83.408105,3a,75y,187.89h,89.08t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sPMsa2ItFTOjzBmyw7MRBfA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
Other FL 14 Point Concerns:
BroSt>-ERScoSt (https://www.google.com/maps/@30.4595332,-83.413566,3a,75y,206.22h,87.18t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sMUpYiiilZTzHK51jlj2juA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192)
RanSt>-RanAve_N (https://www.google.com/maps/@30.4624545,-83.4129407,3a,15y,295.54h,90.42t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sSekJ1D0wZckKaQJjEgQ_ag!2e0!7i13312!8i6656)
-
Is this sign (https://www.google.com/maps/@30.4624239,-83.4098866,3a,15y,213.93h,89.46t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s6yQVbA8M0HV1EQ2w80o2Eg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) enough to add this route? It follows FL 53 down to Harvey Greene Dr back to FL 14. The other signs just say "TRUCK ROUTE" (https://www.google.com/maps/@30.4535278,-83.408105,3a,75y,187.89h,89.08t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sPMsa2ItFTOjzBmyw7MRBfA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
Hmmm, I would say no on this to be honest. Only that one shield, and the few signs that are there say "Truck Route" without a shield, is just not enough. Especially since I have 0 other Truck routes in Florida that are like that currently for the state system.
This might make me take a double check on all the other Truck Routes I have in the US system in FL as well. As the US-17/92 Truck in Kissimmee might need to be axed, even though it's properly signed, but has 'TO' banners. https://goo.gl/maps/KhbZXwm4ERWfKhWo7 Then again, when those two routes join CR-522 to go back to the mainline, there is no 'TO' banner. https://goo.gl/maps/9Zee88UqL5mYKbpn8 Same goes for on CR-522 itself. https://goo.gl/maps/o1HvELtKpviprBfe9 So, it might be safe, as I probably can rule that 'TO' banner set as a possible error with it. Then again, the 'north' end has 'TO' banners to turn onto CR-522. https://goo.gl/maps/4DXwSxAYAz3wbfx56 So, meh. haha.
-
Hmmm, I would say no on this to be honest. Only that one shield, and the few signs that are there say "Truck Route" without a shield, is just not enough. Especially since I have 0 other Truck routes in Florida that are like that currently for the state system.
For better clarification, I see no truck routes in usafl period as of this post.
-
Hmmm, I would say no on this to be honest. Only that one shield, and the few signs that are there say "Truck Route" without a shield, is just not enough. Especially since I have 0 other Truck routes in Florida that are like that currently for the state system.
For better clarification, I see no truck routes in usafl period as of this post.
I have a few in usausb.
And for the record, I did back in the day have this Truck route in the system, but removed it due to the lack of signage once StreetView came to that area with reliable imagery.