Travel Mapping
Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: rickmastfan67 on July 05, 2023, 03:33:44 am
-
Shouldn't those labels either be "US84(#)" or "#(84)" since those are US-84's exit numbers between 166 & 183 and not US-285's? I'd lean more towards the "US84(#)" style labels since US-285 doesn't have any exit numbers of it's own.
-
^ I'll follow up on this and the other NM posts when I'm back home later this month.
-
US-84 doesn't have any exit numbers of it's own.
No - New Mexico mileposts US 84 as a north-south route with a zero point in Fort Sumner, since it's concurrent with other US highways east from there all the way to the Texas line (mostly US 60). So those are US 84-based exit numbers. If they were based on 285, they'd be in the low 300s.
-
US-84 doesn't have any exit numbers of it's own.
No - New Mexico mileposts US 84 as a north-south route with a zero point in Fort Sumner, since it's concurrent with other US highways east from there all the way to the Texas line (mostly US 60). So those are US 84-based exit numbers. If they were based on 285, they'd be in the low 300s.
Hmmm, I just put US-84 in the editor, flipped it, and striped out the US-60 segment and the mileage does then almost match up (3 miles off the exit numbers). Interesting for sure.
Adjusting thread title then.
-
If you want further proof, this is the official NMDOT milepost map:
https://nmdot.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=c4c5fcf8be0f473c873896af264653c0
-
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/6755 (too late for tonight's pull request)
UPDATE: In the HB. Marking as solved.
-
I fixed the Pull Request link.