Travel Mapping
Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: rickmastfan67 on July 12, 2023, 12:21:00 am
-
CRT_StCN -> US-12 has been realigned here. Needs to be adjusted, and IMO, is enough of a news worthy alignment shift.
115(94) -> I-94(115) - since the exit number is posted on I-94 itself, and not on US-12, and this is not a multiplex area, use original style label here.
143(94) -> I-94(143) - same deal as above
85(90) -> I-90(85) - same deal as above
216 -> 215 (https://goo.gl/maps/4d52k2SaoFy6GrNVA)
US12BusBar_E -> 219 (https://goo.gl/maps/LEtRVvT6x2bTUbWp7)
258A -> shift location to Seminole Hwy overpass. (also effects US-14, US-18, & US-151)
259A/259B -> 259 - merge together @ Todd Dr overpass. (also effects US-14, US-18, & US-151)
267 -> interchange has been reconfigured some. recenter point. (also effects I-90, I-39, & US-18)
269 -> CRAB_Dan (no exit number posted, and doesn't look like interchange construction has even started here) (also effects US-18)
WI73_S/WI73_N -> merge them together as WI-73 @ the overpass? Looks like it's a RIRO interchange setup here, and thus can justify having a centered point, and granting a graph connection with WI-73. (also effects US-18)
321A -> 321
321B -> recenter on overpass
-
CRT_StCN -> US-12 has been realigned here. Needs to be adjusted, and IMO, is enough of a news worthy alignment shift.
It's not a realignment, it's me squaring off the corner.
115(94) -> I-94(115) - since the exit number is posted on I-94 itself, and not on US-12, and this is not a multiplex area, use original style label here.
143(94) -> I-94(143) - same deal as above
85(90) -> I-90(85) - same deal as above
This would create inconsistency with the I-94 multiplex near the Minnesota border.
259A/259B -> 259 - merge together @ Todd Dr overpass. (also effects US-14, US-18, & US-151)
What have I said about how anything in Wisconsin results in me changing multiple routes? :pan:
Also, it's affects.
-
CRT_StCN -> US-12 has been realigned here. Needs to be adjusted, and IMO, is enough of a news worthy alignment shift.
It's not a realignment, it's me squaring off the corner.
Ok, so, not a realignment. But still, we don't square off corners like this. I could 'kinda' understand if the route had two connecting legs on either side, but it doesn't here. CRT & US-12 only have 1 intersection, and it honestly should be properly centered on it.
115(94) -> I-94(115) - since the exit number is posted on I-94 itself, and not on US-12, and this is not a multiplex area, use original style label here.
143(94) -> I-94(143) - same deal as above
85(90) -> I-90(85) - same deal as above
This would create inconsistency with the I-94 multiplex near the Minnesota border.
Not really. Are those 'I-94' (& I-90) exit numbers I mentioned above visible from the US-12 mainline in either direction? If the answer is 'no', it should always revert back to the 'I-XX(XX)' style.
259A/259B -> 259 - merge together @ Todd Dr overpass. (also effects US-14, US-18, & US-151)
What have I said about how anything in Wisconsin results in me changing multiple routes? :pan:
Sorry, but can't be helped if there's an error that needs to be addressed, as this is a clear 1PPI issue. Would you use this defense if there was a new exit added along a highway, but there was 5 routes using the highway there?