Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: neroute2 on August 12, 2023, 02:01:09 am

Title: JPN N7 missing interchanges
Post by: neroute2 on August 12, 2023, 02:01:09 am

Between P4 and P3_S:
Oya (https://www.google.com/maps/@37.9167717,139.1155703,3a,49.3y,67.13h,117.78t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1syO9KlDxsP763VcisfWyzww!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu)

Between P27 and P46:
RaceCou (https://www.google.com/maps/@37.9405775,139.1797263,3a,28.7y,54.55h,101.29t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s8FZ7ldHK95xQynZjGQf0LA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu)

Between P46 and P3:
Toy (https://www.google.com/maps/@37.9552823,139.2195624,3a,49y,37.39h,126.04t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sddSoAnM4rJ94fm7Ue73LVg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu)
P556 (https://www.google.com/maps/@37.957757,139.2297585,3a,16.5y,63.88h,112.03t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sgjEqkvnQtxEur9iWTKOcsA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu)
Dai (https://www.google.com/maps/@37.9604091,139.2364382,3a,75y,42.56h,119.49t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sUZgTpvLCPVs8Be_8EslRgw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu)
P204 (https://www.google.com/maps/@37.9664433,139.250954,3a,50.1y,33.86h,111.97t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sMufwPUs6GzXY8-fkPOICLQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu)

Title: Re: JPN N7 missing interchanges
Post by: nezinscot on March 11, 2025, 11:16:03 am

Submitting this change 2025.03.11.

I have wondered whether I should be including ICs with minor roads (prefectural routes >= 100, or unnamed local roads) on controlled-access sections of national highways.  Is it accepted practice to include all ICs on such roads?

I have also wondered whether I should be using the route name or the IC name as the wp name.  I have tended to use the IC name only when there is not a route number.  Is there a standard?

Title: Re: JPN N7 missing interchanges
Post by: michih on March 11, 2025, 01:52:00 pm

Quote from: nezinscot on March 11, 2025, 11:16:03 am

Is there a standard?

https://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/wayptlabels.php#labeling

Title: Re: JPN N7 missing interchanges
Post by: nezinscot on March 11, 2025, 07:07:10 pm

What if there is neither a route name or an IC name - annoyingly common in Japan?   (There probably is a road name, known only to the road dept, such as "Nakayama Traffic Relief Route 6".)  Should I use the town/neighborhood name or something similar?  The names on exit signs are options, but the names often refer to areas not adjacent to the IC, sort of like control cities.

Title: Re: JPN N7 missing interchanges
Post by: neroute2 on March 11, 2025, 07:43:29 pm

If the interchange has a name, that should be an acceptable label.

Title: Re: JPN N7 missing interchanges
Post by: michih on March 12, 2025, 03:25:46 pm

Quote from: nezinscot on March 11, 2025, 07:07:10 pm

What if there is neither a route name or an IC name - annoyingly common in Japan?

Please check option 6 to 9 of the rule linked above.

btw, please click "Topic solved" in all threads to set (https://forum.travelmapping.net/Themes/default/images/post/topicsolved.gif) when you've submitted the pull request. Thanks :)