Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: mapcat on August 30, 2023, 08:56:36 am

Title: CO: US160BusBay unsigned
Post by: mapcat on August 30, 2023, 08:56:36 am
I didn't see any signage along the route through Bayfield, or in advance of it coming from either direction.
Title: Re: CO: US160BusBay unsigned
Post by: the_spui_ninja on August 30, 2023, 11:40:57 am
And it's not even state-maintained as anything. Will ax in next data update.
Title: Re: CO: US160BusBay unsigned
Post by: Markkos1992 on September 04, 2023, 07:16:46 am
The US 160 labels still need to be corrected.  Also I recommend relooking at the WingSongLn label while you are at it.
Title: Re: CO: US160BusBay unsigned
Post by: Duke87 on September 04, 2023, 12:37:53 pm
Quote from: the_spui_ninja on August 30, 2023, 11:40:57 am
And it's not even state-maintained as anything.

Which is meaningful in CO because CO doesn't do local maintenance of routes, even for business loops.
Title: Re: CO: US160BusBay unsigned
Post by: si404 on September 04, 2023, 04:25:58 pm
Quote from: Duke87 on September 04, 2023, 12:37:53 pm
Quote from: the_spui_ninja on August 30, 2023, 11:40:57 am
And it's not even state-maintained as anything.

Which is meaningful in CO because CO doesn't do local maintenance of routes, even for business loops.
they did stuff like write to AASHTO about removing US routes where they gave maintenance to cities. The cities decided to continue to sign it (or the bits were too short for a lack of signs to be noticeable, and the state didn't bother with end banners)