Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: Markkos1992 on January 08, 2024, 11:10:53 am

Title: AR: Little Rock/Pine Bluff Point Concerns
Post by: Markkos1992 on January 08, 2024, 11:10:53 am
When yakra updates quicker than I expected.......

Anyway, restarting here:

US 70:  AshAve>-AshAve_E

US 167: 
1.  The ARDOT Functional Classification Map considers FR9906 as Gillette Trail (https://gis.ardot.gov/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=a740397fe17f4025afb9ae51b45d4841).
2.  CR58 should be relocated north slightly.

AR 338: 
1.  A point should be added at Scott Hamilton Dr (direct connection to I-30).
2. Consider replacing the shaping point west of I-530 with a visible point.

US 79:
1. Consider changing US79Bus to US79BusPin.
2.  WabRd>-MagSt (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.362711,-91.7950502,3a,90y,297.35h,89.22t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sDxltNc0woPF53e2xdel_Tg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DDxltNc0woPF53e2xdel_Tg%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D28.35959%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu) (also affects US 63)
3.  I am unsure JonRd is worth it as a visible point.
4.  Should OldUS79 (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6730642,-91.341314,3a,75y,220.6h,88.63t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sQiMveg0gxI_ERU9A6Vi-pQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu) be marked as closed?
Title: Re: AR: Little Rock/Pine Bluff Point Concerns
Post by: yakra on January 12, 2024, 09:11:18 pm
Quote from: Markkos1992 on January 08, 2024, 11:10:53 am
US 79:
3.  I am unsure JonRd is worth it as a visible point.
Typo?

As for the rest:
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/7159/commits/bf67b62a1b26ce237b61e3a336a77188f18ec3c4
Title: Re: AR: Little Rock/Pine Bluff Point Concerns
Post by: Markkos1992 on January 12, 2024, 09:19:31 pm
Yeah I meant JonDr next to OldUS79.
Title: Re: AR: Little Rock/Pine Bluff Point Concerns
Post by: yakra on January 13, 2024, 09:15:09 am
Necessary shaping point. Removing it brings US79 out of tolerance.
Title: Re: AR: Little Rock/Pine Bluff Point Concerns
Post by: Markkos1992 on January 13, 2024, 09:21:26 am
Quote from: yakra on January 13, 2024, 09:15:09 am
Necessary shaping point. Removing it brings US79 out of tolerance.

Hence why I used the wording visible point.  I would have just kept it as a hidden shaping point.
Title: Re: AR: Little Rock/Pine Bluff Point Concerns
Post by: yakra on January 17, 2024, 03:23:55 pm
https://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/includepts.php#preferintersection
Title: Re: AR: Little Rock/Pine Bluff Point Concerns
Post by: mapcat on January 17, 2024, 06:41:31 pm
I'm with Mark here. No need to make this (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6667142,-91.3745874,3a,65.1y,313.98h,92.92t/data=!3m9!1e1!3m7!1sN4AZUa9cxuJzYNPLsegeYw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192!9m2!1b1!2i40?entry=ttu) visible. Who will ever need this point? I'm not saying that removing it is urgent, but if "prefer visible points always" is the only justification for giving this one a name, then the instructions in the manual deserve reconsideration.