Travel Mapping
Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: vespertine on July 21, 2024, 03:08:19 pm
-
I was mulling around Columbus yesterday, and I noticed a slight change to US23's routing at the south end of downtown. In order to get from High St to the 3rd/4th St couplet, US23 looks like it used to take Livingston (EB) and Fulton (WB) as a couplet. Now, it seems to take Fulton (EB) and Mound (WB) as a couplet. Going SB, here's the signage for the left turn (https://maps.app.goo.gl/tDu3g7RhBgaUoJsG8) at Mound (old green signs in the background no longer have a US23 Fulton St sign), and the right turn (https://maps.app.goo.gl/voGoAU6HzBhkq37M6) onto High. And going NB, here's the signage for the right turn (https://maps.app.goo.gl/2QtifYpo1q1KiTbv6) on Fulton (whose one way has now shifted the other direction in recent years). I don't have signage for the left turn onto 4th, as it's from 2021 when Fulton went one way west, but there are reassurance signs on Fulton St (https://maps.app.goo.gl/KYjTKrHfSfcE45Ru7) (wonderful, easy to see placement /s), and the on the first one on 4th St (https://maps.app.goo.gl/RnRQDihs6Zmdr81u8), before Mound.
-
My note in regard to this was: "Maybe add point at Mound St due to southbound relocation. (https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=5293.msg2672704#msg2672704)"
I was otherwise thinking no-build at the time, but it looks like you cannot turn left from Livingston (https://www.google.com/maps/@39.9527138,-82.9976995,3a,75y,59.59h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sdF97w58Gs7_qSkxMGGY0Bw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205409&entry=ttu) anymore.
-
Thanks. Relocations made. https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/7588 (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/7588)
Some .lists will be broken since the I-70/71 point on US 23 was deleted. The 3rd St/4th St segments are still part of US 33.
-
I must not have clicked the Post button, but I had intended to state that now is a good time to change US33_S on US 23 to US33_E.
-
Meh. It's drafted as a S-N route despite the signage.
-
I would have thought that we would have treated US 33 here similar to US 52. (https://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=3347.msg16533#msg16533)
Of course, if this was Indiana, I would not even bring it up.
-
I would have thought that we would have treated US 33 here similar to US 52. (https://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=3347.msg16533#msg16533)
Of course, if this was Indiana, I would not even bring it up.
Is this a rule, or one of two options?