Travel Mapping
Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: rickmastfan67 on October 14, 2024, 03:57:05 am
-
Just randomly decided to take a look at ON-15 for the first time in 14 years, and discovered it's clearly signed south of ON-401 for a short distance.
This includes full END (https://maps.app.goo.gl/QbFqJkrkKVYnWXvz5)/BEGIN (https://maps.app.goo.gl/1jVo5Mmk5uwF2SGe8) shields which were installed sometime in 2016.
Thus, I'll be extending the route south to a new point called 'RR15' at the location of those shields. This will extend the route 0.37km (0.23 miles) to the south of ON-401.
News entry will be submitted as well when this extension is submitted.
-
So this assembly (https://www.google.com/maps/@44.2896156,-76.4296567,3a,20.8y,227.58h,87.67t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1srawZbffZIrAO5cUpVI6Y9Q!2e0!5s20211001T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D2.3331505143288496%26panoid%3DrawZbffZIrAO5cUpVI6Y9Q%26yaw%3D227.58329791993697!7i16384!8i8192!5m1!1e1?coh=205410&entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI0MTAwOS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D) at the interchange isn't enough to introduce some doubt?
-
So this assembly (https://www.google.com/maps/@44.2896156,-76.4296567,3a,20.8y,227.58h,87.67t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1srawZbffZIrAO5cUpVI6Y9Q!2e0!5s20211001T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D2.3331505143288496%26panoid%3DrawZbffZIrAO5cUpVI6Y9Q%26yaw%3D227.58329791993697!7i16384!8i8192!5m1!1e1?coh=205410&entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI0MTAwOS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D) at the interchange isn't enough to introduce some doubt?
I mean, it does slightly, but they went thru the trouble of installing END/BEGIN shields, which is normally something that's not see in Ontario.
Plus there's an obvious pavement change where those END/BEGIN shields are too.
-
The provincial GIS (https://icorridor-mto-on-ca.hub.arcgis.com/apps/cb3a9bd77f6b4b45990cb25deb7cb71f/explore) shows the route ending at the eastbound exit ramp.
Link (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1i3NBT7WjOJhbvKK07g1U73HF7lrIySeU/view?usp=sharing)
-
The provincial GIS (https://icorridor-mto-on-ca.hub.arcgis.com/apps/cb3a9bd77f6b4b45990cb25deb7cb71f/explore) shows the route ending at the eastbound exit ramp.
Link (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1i3NBT7WjOJhbvKK07g1U73HF7lrIySeU/view?usp=sharing)
Interesting, but that isn't 100% reliable. The ON-6 change I recently made is an example (https://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=6465.0).
Also, several other routes have gaps thru towns, but are fully signed.
Anyways, that GIS might give me a reason to look into ON-49 some at least.
-
The provincial GIS (https://icorridor-mto-on-ca.hub.arcgis.com/apps/cb3a9bd77f6b4b45990cb25deb7cb71f/explore) shows the route ending at the eastbound exit ramp.
Link (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1i3NBT7WjOJhbvKK07g1U73HF7lrIySeU/view?usp=sharing)
Interesting, but that isn't 100% reliable. The ON-6 change I recently made is an example (https://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=6465.0).
Another good example would be ON-66.
1) GIS doesn't correctly show the 'western' end. It still shows the old route to the old bridge for ON-66/SH-566. Yet, it shows the correct route & wrong route for SH-566 there. lol.
2) Doesn't show the recent northern bypass of North Virginiatown. Still shows the old route which is no-more.
So, still, at least the GIS is decent data for double checking SH/TH highways that GSV hasn't been on yet (or may never be) to at least map what is assumed to be the 'end' of the route.
-
The small southern extension has been submitted.
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/7807