Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Topic started by: michih on October 17, 2024, 02:07:41 pm

Title: TUR: Boyabat bypass
Post by: michih on October 17, 2024, 02:07:41 pm

There is a GSJ at the bypass' north end that needs to be added to D785.
The wp at-grade junction at the bypass' south end should also be a D785 wp.
D30 should also get a wp.

https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?r=tur.d785&lat=41.490598&lon=34.795246&zoom=13

Challenge: The bypass has no name (on OSM). Please check. I think that we could use "Byp" for Bypass if we have no better name. Or what's the Turkish name for bypass?

Title: Re: TUR: Boyabat bypass
Post by: panda80 on November 15, 2024, 05:05:47 am

Now the bypass is shown as D785 on OSM, rerouted D785 accordingly. D030 remains through the town. Should come with the next update.

Title: TUR: Major issues with D030 route
Post by: rickmastfan67 on November 16, 2024, 01:37:22 am

This route alone, has 8 issues on the data check that should be addressed ASAP.

Code: [Select]

tur.d030 +X58,+X58 DUPLICATE_COORDS (40.782548,36.255623) tur.d030;+X58;+X58;;DUPLICATE_COORDS;(40.782548,36.255623)
tur.d030 +X58 DUPLICATE_LABEL This is always a true error and cannot be marked false positive.
tur.d030 +X58,D100,I05-01 SHARP_ANGLE 169.31 tur.d030;+X58;D100;I05-01;SHARP_ANGLE;169.31
tur.d030 D100 DUPLICATE_LABEL This is always a true error and cannot be marked false positive.
tur.d030 D100,D100 DUPLICATE_COORDS (40.746281,36.29076) tur.d030;D100;D100;;DUPLICATE_COORDS;(40.746281,36.29076)
tur.d030 D100,I05-01,+X58 SHARP_ANGLE 170.63 tur.d030;D100;I05-01;+X58;SHARP_ANGLE;170.63
tur.d030 I05-01 DUPLICATE_LABEL This is always a true error and cannot be marked false positive.
tur.d030 I05-01,I05-01 DUPLICATE_COORDS (40.810935,36.199254) tur.d030;I05-01;I05-01;;DUPLICATE_COORDS;(40.810935,36.199254)

Title: Re: TUR: Boyabat bypass
Post by: michih on November 16, 2024, 01:41:41 pm

Thanks @rickmastfan67, just introduced yesterday: https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/7914/files#diff-632ece885c19ed15bf792f736363d598738ad67ee9a70253520b0490edb6f19f
It seems that the last three lines have been duplicated by accident.

Title: Re: TUR: Boyabat bypass
Post by: panda80 on November 19, 2024, 04:00:03 am

corrected, should come with the next update.

Title: Re: TUR: Boyabat bypass
Post by: rickmastfan67 on November 20, 2024, 02:33:40 am

Quote from: panda80 on November 15, 2024, 05:05:47 am

Now the bypass is shown as D785 on OSM, rerouted D785 accordingly.

Just an FYI, but D785 also has a duplicate label issue.

Code: [Select]

tur.d785 Cem DUPLICATE_LABEL This is always a true error and cannot be marked false positive.
Word of advice, always use the WPT online editor on longer routes to see if there are duplicate labels (especially if you're adding a new bypass in the middle of it), as this was also introduced at the same time as the D030 one was (which has been fixed).

There's also some other TUR issues on the datacheck page that should be addressed as well, but they aren't related to this thread  (as far as I know).

Title: Re: TUR: Boyabat bypass
Post by: michih on November 20, 2024, 11:19:47 am

There are also DL errors in ROU: https://travelmapping.net/devel/datacheck.php?rg=bgr,esh,hun,mar,mne,rou,tur&hide=VISIBLE_DISTANCE

Title: Re: TUR: Boyabat bypass
Post by: panda80 on November 26, 2024, 07:11:30 am

corrected all error, should come with the next update.

Title: Re: TUR: Boyabat bypass
Post by: michih on November 26, 2024, 12:49:48 pm

all but TUR D565Tek ;)

Title: Re: TUR: Boyabat bypass
Post by: panda80 on November 28, 2024, 10:44:21 am

comes with the next update. not being an error, I ignored it :)

Title: Re: TUR: Boyabat bypass
Post by: michih on November 28, 2024, 02:30:34 pm

It is not a FP but the Label should be D020_E! I‘ve closed your PR.