Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: rickmastfan67 on July 24, 2025, 04:37:28 am

Title: LA: I-110 Exit number issues
Post by: rickmastfan67 on July 24, 2025, 04:37:28 am
I-10 -> 1K (https://maps.app.goo.gl/FNex5j5xGY5zZ9HC7) or 1I (yes, that's a capital letter I)
2B -> should we 'also' have a 2C here for the other ramp from I-110 to LA-67?  Seems two separate graph connections with LA-67 would be justifiable here.
4A -> 4 (https://maps.app.goo.gl/tsJBCwAH8w2x3ZVU6)
4B -> 5A (https://maps.app.goo.gl/Z6GHbeTS8EeZMjpF6)
5 -> 5B (https://maps.app.goo.gl/pSjyMmAUcr9AsL8D9) (yes, signed the same number both directions)
8 -> 8A (https://maps.app.goo.gl/x87qhcYir3B2C9TM9) (yes, I know we have '8A' currently on the ending point, so, if you don't want to make this change I can understand.)
8A -> 8B or 8C (https://maps.app.goo.gl/Fbnuha7PrHaoPfm1A) (would go with '8B', as that's what's currently mentioned in US-61's file)

==

All changes would also have to be applied to 'LA GRRBat', sans the ending label one @ I-10/I-110.
Title: Re: LA: I-110 Exit number issues
Post by: cenlaroads on July 24, 2025, 05:13:13 pm
Quote from: rickmastfan67 on July 24, 2025, 04:37:28 am
I-10 -> 1K (https://maps.app.goo.gl/FNex5j5xGY5zZ9HC7) or 1I (yes, that's a capital letter I)
2B -> should we 'also' have a 2C here for the other ramp from I-110 to LA-67?  Seems two separate graph connections with LA-67 would be justifiable here.
4A -> 4 (https://maps.app.goo.gl/tsJBCwAH8w2x3ZVU6)
4B -> 5A (https://maps.app.goo.gl/Z6GHbeTS8EeZMjpF6)
5 -> 5B (https://maps.app.goo.gl/pSjyMmAUcr9AsL8D9) (yes, signed the same number both directions)
8 -> 8A (https://maps.app.goo.gl/x87qhcYir3B2C9TM9) (yes, I know we have '8A' currently on the ending point, so, if you don't want to make this change I can understand.)
8A -> 8B or 8C (https://maps.app.goo.gl/Fbnuha7PrHaoPfm1A) (would go with '8B', as that's what's currently mentioned in US-61's file)

==

All changes would also have to be applied to 'LA GRRBat', sans the ending label one @ I-10/I-110.

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/8520

Thanks.  Some of these were included in a list that Markkos1992 provided a while back.  I've been slowly working through it.  I made all of these changes except the following, for now:

Quote from: rickmastfan67 on July 24, 2025, 04:37:28 am
2B -> should we 'also' have a 2C here for the other ramp from I-110 to LA-67?  Seems two separate graph connections with LA-67 would be justifiable here.

The points would be 0.26 miles apart.  Would 1PPI apply here?

Quote from: rickmastfan67 on July 24, 2025, 04:37:28 am
8 -> 8A (https://maps.app.goo.gl/x87qhcYir3B2C9TM9) (yes, I know we have '8A' currently on the ending point, so, if you don't want to make this change I can understand.)

I didn't change it for the reason you mentioned.  8A will need to remain an alternate label for the northern end.
Title: Re: LA: I-110 Exit number issues
Post by: rickmastfan67 on July 24, 2025, 09:23:07 pm
Quote from: cenlaroads on July 24, 2025, 05:13:13 pm
Quote from: rickmastfan67 on July 24, 2025, 04:37:28 am
2B -> should we 'also' have a 2C here for the other ramp from I-110 to LA-67?  Seems two separate graph connections with LA-67 would be justifiable here.

The points would be 0.26 miles apart.  Would 1PPI apply here?

Debatable in some cases.  I personally would add both, due to I-110 having that funky curve.
Title: Re: LA: I-110 Exit number issues
Post by: cenlaroads on July 26, 2025, 07:54:29 pm
Added to pull request:  https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/8530